The difference is that Roberts used statistical evidence of past elections to justify making changes for future elections. That's different than using it to justify reversing the current one.

@thebrodys aha so he is saying the remedy should be that the court sends it to congress to choose the president. Robert (R&R) has addressed such remedies before and has explained that courts are _extremely_ reluctant to take remedies that are larger than the damage, though it isn't impossible

If there are fraudulent ballots that are considered verified then yes a recount just counts them again and says yep all checks out

Well... dead people vote, don't they?

When ur named Team Strike Force.. and says the Kraken will be released. . Doesn't give u alot of credibility

They voted in a dead man you tell me

2 dead men come to think of it 3 if you include vices

Well when you word it like that... 😂

Unpopular opinion of the day: dead people should have the right to vote.

@TaLoN132 like that lady that Tucker and the president mentioned.. who was alive

same as minors

they're as valid to vote than the dead

Tucker came back sorry . My apologies. We made a mistake

Just start when they are in the womb

Yea that might be another problem (if true)

a reason to keep that yiffer rather than to wire em that'd be a nice way to prevent these 9th month atrocities

Yes... but they have not proven anything that rises to the level of fraud to account for millions of fraudulent votes. The closest might be Matt Braynard, but he didn't prove fraud, he proved that there are some instances of potential fraud that needs to be investigated further - and the limited time that he had makes any claim of scale very tenuous.

Hard to prove when states are refusing audits...deleting info...and rushing to certify

amen ^^

Also hard to prove when you don’t have anything

And relying on public opinion

@RickyDigits Trump want a recount. Another hand recount. And a third recount.

@MatiLuc, you just advanced to level 8!

No I think what they want is an audit

If an elaborate Dominion conspiracy claim starts off with ' it necessarily isn't provable by its own design', you're going to have a bad time in court.

Stats are used as an Inference to go to Trial or a Hearing.

Not a recount

No one wants to do an audit

I don't know... Biden is surprisingly fit. He bounded to the podium to make his acceptance speech... And have you seen him ride a bike? I hope I am that fit...

Which says a lot

Also hard to prove the dominion stuff when the software is protected trade secret and no one wants to show the logs

You can’t seriously believe Biden is fit and healthy?

The Georgia certified. And he the secretary of state is a Republican. That says alot

I would _pay lots of money_ to see Trump and Biden duke it out WWE style

Georgia also said they'd do an audit and bait and switched a recount not reverifying anything

Pretty telling

All states should be doing risk limited audits. GA did the most extensive one. Are you familiar with the way that risk limiting audits are performed? It's a relatively new concept and I wasn't aware of them until recently.

> Also hard to prove the dominion stuff when the software is protected trade secret and no one wants to show the logs
@RickyDigits Weird. They know enough about it to claim that it is completely untraceable, according to what they filed.

They are looking at data anomalies

Public data

per court order no worries that is given ^^