Hard to prove when states are refusing audits...deleting info...and rushing to certify

amen ^^

Also hard to prove when you don’t have anything

And relying on public opinion

@RickyDigits Trump want a recount. Another hand recount. And a third recount.

@MatiLuc, you just advanced to level 8!

No I think what they want is an audit

If an elaborate Dominion conspiracy claim starts off with ' it necessarily isn't provable by its own design', you're going to have a bad time in court.

Stats are used as an Inference to go to Trial or a Hearing.

Not a recount

No one wants to do an audit

I don't know... Biden is surprisingly fit. He bounded to the podium to make his acceptance speech... And have you seen him ride a bike? I hope I am that fit...

Which says a lot

Also hard to prove the dominion stuff when the software is protected trade secret and no one wants to show the logs

You can’t seriously believe Biden is fit and healthy?

The Georgia certified. And he the secretary of state is a Republican. That says alot

I would _pay lots of money_ to see Trump and Biden duke it out WWE style

Georgia also said they'd do an audit and bait and switched a recount not reverifying anything

Pretty telling

All states should be doing risk limited audits. GA did the most extensive one. Are you familiar with the way that risk limiting audits are performed? It's a relatively new concept and I wasn't aware of them until recently.

> Also hard to prove the dominion stuff when the software is protected trade secret and no one wants to show the logs
@RickyDigits Weird. They know enough about it to claim that it is completely untraceable, according to what they filed.

They are looking at data anomalies

Public data

per court order no worries that is given ^^

If they are seeing stuff that suggests possible fraud shouldnt we be able to look deeper

Does it hurt to look

We have spent a lot of time trying to reproduce several "data anomalies" in this channel heh

That's the issue

No one wants to look

(none came to fruition and some were debunked)

That should be the way they decide who is president if no one gets 270...

by the time alotted in a year they'll get 270 even if they squint

Clinton supporters were saying the same thing 4 years ago...

I think it was Jill and her campaign got them to stop looking

> No one wants to look
@RickyDigits They had to have looked, otherwise what they submitted to the court about complete untraceability was laughably, egregiously speculative.

If republicans lose, I hope they at least learn their lesson. Ban any electronic or machine form of voting and require ID and proof of address for voting.

@TaLoN132 gotta research that about 2016. Clinton supporters

Jill was pushing a recount and the dnc convinced her to drop it

I still think that's because of the way that NEP and AP collect the data, aggregate it, and upload it to the various news organizations.

Did you see my graph?

There is a reason most first world nation outright BAN voting machines.