The supervisors went against the counties policies for poll observers to do their job and that was to observe to make sure there was integrity. They were not given that opportunity. They were intimidated.

@JonasRobert trumps lawyers admitted this

admitted what?

oh sry I see

See my follow up msg lol

So you say. Ive seen no evidence of that

@JD~Jordan, you just advanced to level 7!

the lawyers admitted they were "present", because they were in the room. That wasn't their argument though. Their argument was they werent allowed to observe the ballots

Lol there is no argument as to why anyone needs to stay more than 6 ft away.

6 feet is even too far. You have to be able to verify each signature

This is done on purpose. An Overload of disinformation countering every story back-and-forth where nobody can keep up

Listen to Fauci. Lol

No clue which one you mean

@JonasRobert https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/exasperated-judges-question-trump-lawyers-on-election-claims-leading-to-one-nonzero-admission

You should look at what the trump team presents in court. Everyone is like they won’t let them present evidence or the judges are biased. This is not the case. Trumps entire legal team quit ( and no not because of threats) it’s because they did not want to be disbarred

Imagine you get carded trying to buy a beer and you try to show your ID from 6 feet away lol

That simply isnt reasonable, you have to be extremely close

Oh, got ya. This one.

I feel like that could be demonstrated really quickly lol. I’m not sure if those votes should be rendered invalid, but... these election officials enforcing this should get some heat.

You should see this to get an idea of what these trump lawsuits are like https://youtu.be/Q_get06-tgo @JonasRobert

put your ID on the counter and move back?

I think he’s saying if you were to hold it up and someone had to read it from 6 ft away.

If you listen to the affidavits testimonies you will be highly surprised by their observation experiences.

I agree... six feet is not ideal. Not suggesting that it is... But its not a violation of the law. Judges ruled on this real time. Team Trump went to court on election day to challenge this... judges said the six foot rule did not violate the statutes.

We were in a pandemic. I mean I dont know what you want me to say... it was not illegal. You cant just kick out an entire polling place because you didnt like the procedure.

Oh yeah... btw... this rule was in place all over the US... anyone complaining about it in states Trump won? No? Shocked.

I agree, disclaimer here, from what I’ve heard there seems to be multiple witnesses to poll watchers being prohibited from watching.

I think it's sad the way that they made fun of that poor guy. It really spoke to the character and attitude of the people taking the video. They saw someone doing their job in plain site of everyone there. I would hate to have to do my work in a fish bowl situation like that. And then to have them dox him and post a video acting like bullies... It's ridiculous. He didn't "palm" a memory card. That guy's life and self esteem are going to be irreparably harmed and all because people assumed that there was fraud happening. Without Trump saying there was going to be fraud, that guy would have just done his job and gone home.

Later on, there is a lady berating people who are trying to do their job and figure out what happened. The fact that they found 2700 votes that should have been processed was a good thing. It was part of the canvassing effort that they combined with the hand recount. The assumption is that there will be fraud - every election worker is suspect. If they take to long on their bathroom break, it must've been fraud.

well here in the UK the usual thing when you need to show some doc/id like in the pharmacy is to put it on the counter

counters have some plastic/plexiglass shields and it's hard to even hear anyway

prohibited from watching what though? the folks outside banging on the glass demanding to be let in?

Yeah, I get that, I just don’t think that was the point of his example.

I am fine conceding that not every affidavit or suit is bullet proof. But this does nothing to dispute the rest of the body of evidence. And simply saying "because some ppl submitted a spammy affidavit we are going to discount EVERYONES affidavit" doesnt make sense

I think I missed something because people are just spamming their own thing in the channel anyway 😄

The ballots being counted lol.

sorry @yetiCodes

Poll observers take their job very seriously. Pandemic or not, there was blatant intimidation of poll observers and failure by supervisors to be cordial to poll observers.

I mean you guys do get that if you get to enforce this throw out all the votes in polling places that had the six foot rule that team Biden could do the exact same thing in Trump counties...

It is simply NOT a viable remedy to ignore the votes of an entire polling place on thsi six foot crap

No problem. 🤙🏼🤙🏼

What if they don't take enough time? Fraud&&

because the Trump legal team files a lawsuit that say poll watchers werent allowed in the room to watch votes counted and the judge said were there GOP poll watchers in the room and they said there was a nonzero number

LOL... yeah "a non zero number" LOL

I think it would be helpful if people spent more time describing the laws, purpose, and procedures regarding the watchers w/ regard to absentee ballots. The notion that the campaign had people "present in the room" is complete nonsense.

now that is just embarrassing

Again, I don’t think that’s a satisfying remedy for the perceived harm, but I think there is an argument to be made that this was sketchy as hell. Lol. Layman’s terms.