Someone posted earlier that no one was asked to leave but they left anyways out of confusion

Bruh... This cope is fucking amazing

The assuming is amazing

Littreally have video of it.

There is no evidence of voter fraud

Ok but, there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud

Ok but, There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the election <--- You are here

Ok but, its too late to change the outcome now

Apparently it’s already been investigated

No. This is the first time that the video was released.

The senator questioning it tried to claim it was debunked

She got BTFO'd

"ITS BEEN DEBUNKED!!! THE AP SAID ITS DEBUNKED 5 SECONDS AFTER THE VIDEO WAS RELEASED"

@ImNotGas the third one was always the official statement. No one said elections were perfect if that they are void of fraud

This is probably the last live stream I'll listen to about the election. @RobertGrulerEsq has lost all pretense of showing the perspective from both sides. We don't even review the left's cases. The NV hearing today was a clinic. Kevin Hamilton absolutely destroyed Trump's lawyer IN COURT. He went point by point and completely obliterated the Trump case. It was embarrassingly bad.

It's the same thing that happened to Rogan and Shapiro (they saw huge jumps in views once they threw in with Trump and got huge backlash whenever they contradicted Trump)... If they tell MAGA what they want and only what they want, their viewership will go up. Notice when Robert shows both perspectives , his video viewership drops. When he MAGA's up, his views go through the roof. It's disappointing. The appeal for me was to hear unbiased breakdown of cases from both perspectives.

debunked debunked!!!

"please stop this nonsense guys im s..serious its debunked, just give up. PLEASE give up"

@ImNotGas the AP has a better track record than any of these guliani clown witnesses

so the reaction to a debunked perspective rooted in confirmation bias is a bad thing @DrSammyD

weird robert loses his objectivity when he reports on things you dont agree with

Confirmation bias? You're assuming it in bad faith.

I'm not even a MAGA trump supporter

I just visualized Guliani in front of 8 very sad clowns. It seemed to fit.

Confirmation bias has no moral value attached to it @DrSammyD

I'm a single issue voter, anti-war

It’s not morally good or bad it’s just a problem for objectivity

I've already displayed anti-confirmation bias by looking into the statistical analysis with @realz and coming to the conclusion that it was bunk

Robert is the most unbiased commentator I've found. I'm pro-trump and at least a couple times per stream I'll find myself being like "gah robert is a fucking moron how could he say the evidence wont convince a judge?!" But IMO that's a ***good*** sign. You should not always be happy and in agreement about what your information sources have to say.

I called the Dominon out as being nonsense as soon as it was began bubbling up.

One instance is a small victory , every instance is a bigger victory @DrSammyD

New lawsuit filed - DOJ vs. Facebook https://www.theblaze.com/news/doj-lawsuit-facebook-hiring-foreign

@carolinaflying, you just advanced to level 3!

@DrSammyD that’s not hard to do

Rob is starting to sound a little less balanced and more right wing recently with these events. But then he will say something and I will recognize he is trying to maintain his neutrality.

No one should be congratulated for dismissing the Powell garbage

I've had good faith arguments with everybody (including @TaLoN132 ). You're the hold out for any give what so ever.

@True maga bucks is very attractive

@carolinaflying I wonder if the zoomers can collectively sue FB for their lost childhoods.

@DrSammyD I am the epitome of good faith

I would testify for the plaintiff.

@james j I have been following the channel since before the election. I don't think Rob is selling out

Not yet

I don't think Robert's biases have shifted or become more transparent...I think we have seen the evidence get gradually stronger over time and so his commentary reflects that?

That's not true... I've been tracking it for a while.. He used to say stuff like... "Well, here's X's side and why that makes sense. And here's Y's side and this is how they will argue. Both are good arguments, but I think that X has the better case." I don't care who he thinks is better... I just liked it when broke down both sides.