Message from @True
Discord ID: 784228021653340182
Confirmation bias? You're assuming it in bad faith.
I'm not even a MAGA trump supporter
I just visualized Guliani in front of 8 very sad clowns. It seemed to fit.
I'm a single issue voter, anti-war
It’s not morally good or bad it’s just a problem for objectivity
I've already displayed anti-confirmation bias by looking into the statistical analysis with @realz and coming to the conclusion that it was bunk
Robert is the most unbiased commentator I've found. I'm pro-trump and at least a couple times per stream I'll find myself being like "gah robert is a fucking moron how could he say the evidence wont convince a judge?!" But IMO that's a ***good*** sign. You should not always be happy and in agreement about what your information sources have to say.
I called the Dominon out as being nonsense as soon as it was began bubbling up.
One instance is a small victory , every instance is a bigger victory @DrSammyD
New lawsuit filed - DOJ vs. Facebook https://www.theblaze.com/news/doj-lawsuit-facebook-hiring-foreign
@carolinaflying, you just advanced to level 3!
Rob is starting to sound a little less balanced and more right wing recently with these events. But then he will say something and I will recognize he is trying to maintain his neutrality.
No one should be congratulated for dismissing the Powell garbage
I've had good faith arguments with everybody (including @TaLoN132 ). You're the hold out for any give what so ever.
@carolinaflying I wonder if the zoomers can collectively sue FB for their lost childhoods.
I would testify for the plaintiff.
@james j I have been following the channel since before the election. I don't think Rob is selling out
Not yet
I don't think Robert's biases have shifted or become more transparent...I think we have seen the evidence get gradually stronger over time and so his commentary reflects that?
That's not true... I've been tracking it for a while.. He used to say stuff like... "Well, here's X's side and why that makes sense. And here's Y's side and this is how they will argue. Both are good arguments, but I think that X has the better case." I don't care who he thinks is better... I just liked it when broke down both sides.
I used to respect Barnes views until I learned he basically works for the trump campaign
He might say a sentence or 2 at the end of the show...
*Pro bono
You should watch the NV case today,,, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdPT2saxs18 The audio is bad, but this shows how one of these cases actually goes in court.
I don't know that I can trust NTD. They are a chinese company
It's a live stream of a US Court case from today.
Uhh, pretty sure they're an american company of a chineese imigrant.
They are the most pro Trump Chinese company
It’s weird
probably taiwan backed
Falun Gong
they are bitter enemies of the CCP
You can't trust them because they are biased; that doesn't mean they don't have things you can glean
I've found some of the Falun Gong's stuff interesting despite being biased
chances are if you search for news about china, you will be watching or reading their stuff, because no one else covers it
It is literally a live stream... No commentary. Just court.
