Isn't that technically illegal?

I said I wasn't going to take any bets, and simply see what happens

I thought that said klan

As I recall the PA Supreme Court amended the act by allowing mail in votes to be returned up to 3 days after the election. That's where at least the problem I'm aware of was. It violates equal protection as everyone voting in person was limited to having their votes in on election day.

@Adam135 you said until

Which means you would after you see what happens

😄

You can’t do that

not how bets work

except in boxing.

That doesn't mean I'm going to make a bet immediately after the fact 🙄

I’ll bet you 5 dollars right now. @Adam135 before things happen

Accepting votes which were in transit violates equal protection. Splain.

Technically the real time to bet was prior to November 3rd.

But you know.

Amazon gift card

I’ll take a easy bet

@Maw I bet a crate of wine that there would be no president elect and comrade Pelosi took office.

Oof I want off of this timeline if that's true.

equal protection requires that everyone be treated equally. by allowing the mail in votes to be treated differently they violated the equal protections of the constitution

I want whoever trump supporters hate most to be president

It's been so long, but I don't remember the law firm stating that they were exiting the case out of fear from attacks. I do think they were concerned about their reputation if they continued to present a very questionable case. That would be a good business decision, if that were the case. Look at what is happening to the reputations of those pushing those cases forward now. They may be popular with Trump supporters, but they are taking a big hit in the courts. Law Firms are evaluated by their success rates in court - adding dozens of losses to their records would impact their bottom line.

@james j They're dead.

Hunter Biden 2020

Naw, that's not who Trump supporters hate the most.

@Maw

@Maw who do they hate that is dead? Well I’ll take the living person they hate the most

Soros2020

I think he would make a better head of the DEA he seems like he might be the legalization plight

Are you suggesting that a person does not deserve legal representation if someone doesn't agree with their case?

because, that would seem to violate due process

@james j Remember when I said that partisan politics like this is a really bad thing for the country?

You're proving my point.

Or he'd end up in an evidence room with a heart attack

@Soburin Telling people they can vote that way, them voting in good faith and then disqualifying their votes might somewhat nudge up against equal protection too. Watcha think?

The country is already divided the most American thing to do is lean into capitalism and profit @Maw

My issue is with the PA Supreme Court applying laches. It’s an easy way out. It’s unconstitutional and not sure if it was even ripe until after the election.

@Steeler26, you just advanced to level 2!

So it seems like the far left wants civil war as well.

selling T-shirts with F^CK [fill inn yourself]

It is kind of a catch 22 situation with PA