I think he would make a better head of the DEA he seems like he might be the legalization plight

Are you suggesting that a person does not deserve legal representation if someone doesn't agree with their case?

because, that would seem to violate due process

@james j Remember when I said that partisan politics like this is a really bad thing for the country?

You're proving my point.

Or he'd end up in an evidence room with a heart attack

@Soburin Telling people they can vote that way, them voting in good faith and then disqualifying their votes might somewhat nudge up against equal protection too. Watcha think?

The country is already divided the most American thing to do is lean into capitalism and profit @Maw

My issue is with the PA Supreme Court applying laches. It’s an easy way out. It’s unconstitutional and not sure if it was even ripe until after the election.

@Steeler26, you just advanced to level 2!

So it seems like the far left wants civil war as well.

selling T-shirts with F^CK [fill inn yourself]

It is kind of a catch 22 situation with PA

God this is horribly irresponsible.

@Maw noone wants a civil war more than those who have never seen one.

I think you're right... so basically the PA court potentially disenfranchised all the mail in voters in PA that meet those criteria.

@Maw I don’t know what that far left wants but I have alluded to secession many times but you said that topic is not allowed

@Doc We have modern-day versions happening to this day, I'm surprised they are sheltered from the footage.

Different case... This is the one that is asking for Act 77 - at least the part allowing no-excuse mail-in voting - in unconstitutional... and asked that either the mail-in votes be invalidated giving Trump the election win or to have them invalidate the entire election and let the legislature determine the slate of electors to submit, if I recall correctly. I'll look it up and update you if I was mistaken.

footing is one thing. Footage does not have smell.

and there is something in a childs voice the camera cant catch.

I said the topic of civil war isn't allowed. Balkanization is a little different, and it largely depends on how you utilize the topic.

Telling people to get out of your country and stuff isn't regarded very highly.

I'm pretty sure we're talking about the same issue. The case was originally taken to SCOTUS before the election but because ACB hadn't been seated yet there was a 4-4 tie and it went back to the state. Alito then told PA to segregate the votes that came in after the deadline so that the case could be reheard after the election.

https://electionwiz.com/2020/12/06/breaking-georgia-senators-introduce-petition-calling-for-special-session/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

> I think you're right... so basically the PA court potentially disenfranchised all the mail in voters in PA that meet those criteria.
@Soburin As long as those American voters' votes count, they aren't being violated. That's how elections work.

“Believe” more like pretend because he knows the Trump base have been gaslit to believe what they want to have happened

Everyone has been gaslit by each other.

I'm not sure how you got that from what I said... I think law firms choose who they would like to represent all the time. There is nothing compelling a law firm to represent anyone they don't wan to. Are you suggesting otherwise?

You're missing the problem. The problem is having that amount of time allowed the cheating to occur. They had 3 days to manufacture votes which appears to be what happened.

This isn't trump-exclusive.

No this is the case brought by congressman Kelly from Pa. lost on laches in PA SC and is asking SCOTUS to hear it. The case you are referring to is also still pending.

@Soburin. I believe you are correct. Accepting Absentee Ballots after Election Day?

@Soburin Nope. You have to prove that those votes were manufactured...and then it's not a function of the extension. They could have been doing it for months prior.

The democrats are going through a civil war between establishment and progressives, the Republicans are sitting on the fence about Trump because they have to prioritize their seats in congress.

This gas-lighting cuts both ways

The law firm was threatened both personally and professionally. The threats were significant and credible enough that they felt it was in their best interest to not represent the president. is this appropriate and can you see how it could leave the president without council if all lawyers were as gutless?

I was threatened. Therefore fraud.

That's exactly what I've been saying but the courts won't hear the case... see the problem?

I don't think there was even this amount internal fighting several years ago.

Trump can always blame it on people who are alleging fraud