Message from @Adam135
Discord ID: 785260437775450154
I'm a professional ninja that practices the dark art of election magic.
@busillis fraud is an overused term. Ballots submitted or counted in violation of Law is not necessarily Fraud Per Say.
With fraud you need to establish intent right?
Only possible in one or two states
or impropriety
@Adam135 correct. Election Laws can be Strick Liability....
Thatโs your opinion. SCOTUS hasnโt ruled either way. Their certification means nothing.
If the bandaids you put on a conspiracy theory start to outweigh the skin, it's time for some sober reflection.
I don't think SCOTUS would overturn the election results per se, but I think they may, whether justified or not, can suspend or deny certification
If they reached that conclusion that is
If there is proof that legal votes postmarked by 11/3 were received after 11/3 that exceeded the margin of error, then they should provide that proof. I would also contend that the only way that 81k+ votes didn't get there in time was due to an illegal concerted effort to disenfranchise voters by purposely slowing down the mail delivery.
The supreme court can deny certification? That sounds wrong.
A lot of things have to happen for Trump to pull this off and so far that's not the trend
Is there any paper trail that would indicate when those ballots are collected or arrive at a processing center.
if they back-dated them, it would be pretty hard to discern those from ones that came before 11/3
@Adam135 i believe the Court can rule that the Election was held or counted in violation of Law and Null and Void. Not determine a winner. It would fall onto the Constitutional Requirements after that to determine the State Electors.
right, that's what I meant to say.
The key to that being CAN
People are saying they are constantly muddying and then testing the waters for support of an actual military-backed coup.
@William Dinan Considering you're talking about state-specific laws, I'm not so sure.
had to go look it up. Presidents legal team is challenging 700k votes in PA that were counted while poll watchers weren't permitted to watch. So, the mail in vote issue was different.
Not denying certification but if they throw votes out due to it being unconstitutional, they could remand it back to count the legal votes which could change the outcome of certifying the winner.
I would assume so... there may be some via the USPS even. I think it matters the type of postage as to the level of tracking. That is why, I think, some states opted to pre-pay the postage on their envelopes. They don't get the postmark on some of those prepaid rates, so some states require the voter to supply postage. That's an over-simplification from what I recall off the top of my head.
@Steeler26 I don't see the unconstitutional argument for a lot of these cases. 77 is different because of how it changed.
Which was legislation from the bench.
@Maw State Courts yes. Federal Court's can uphold The US Constitution and Federal Laws. The US Constitution establishes the Authority to the State Legislature and the US Congress respectively.
Trump's operation warp speed https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/12/moral-imperative-get-vaccination-done-quickly/617310/๐
77 is definitely different for sure. Will be interesting if SCOTUS grants review of a state constitution arguably tied to the federal constitution.
It's a breach of the branches of power, it's definitely something unconstitutional.
@Maw. Seperation of Powers.
Yes, this is what I meant.
It is breaching the branch and reaching into another branch.
Will they prosecute the voters or is their votes being vetoed by the government enough punishment?
Attempted election tampering.
I don't know if the SCOTUS could offer that kind of relief.
I imagine they'd only say you have to change your law.