> talking about act77.

Again.

Not Georgia.

Yeah that's the one that wasn't signed by the Pennsylvania State legislature

Pennsylvania isn't going to put dude over the top

@JD~Jordan the Attorney for a Political Party is not the same as the Legislative Branch.

I just came into the chat.. which is why I asked... no need to be snotty

I'm just informing you we're talking about act 77.

Misses the point entirely.... I just said that Republicans had input into the Settlement Agreement in Georgia.

Not that it was required or a substitute for the legislative branch.

@JD~Jordan which at the end of the day amounts to 0

For gop

That is a question?

I think you miss the Point. @JD~Jordan

Are there trying to force Georgia to drop votes

So they don't take it to court?

> @TaLoN132 Last I checked it was unconstitutional because the legislation changed via the court, and not the legislation.
This is who I was commenting to, @JD~Jordan, if you had read just slightly further back you'd see what we were talking about. This is all I was saying, relax.

The GA State Republican Party and the GA State Legislature are two different entities.

I'm am lost on ga

Georgia is currently my favorite state.

Justice Alito even said “It would be highly desirable to issue a ruling on the con- stitutionality of the State Supreme Court’s decision before the election. That question has national importance, and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution. The provisions of the Federal Constitution conferring on state legislatures, not state courts, the authority to make rules governing fed- eral elections would be meaningless if a state court could override the rules adopted by the legislature simply by claiming that a state constitutional provision gave the courts the authority to make whatever rules it thought ap- propriate for the conduct of a fair election”

Is that where the kraken come from?

@Zuluzeit It's because the devil (Marx) went there isn't it?!?!?!

Lmfao

Savannah Georgia is actually pretty cool

He was lookin for a poll to steal

LMAO

Not sure how much more clear I can make this... I am referring to the Settlement Agreement between the Sec of State in GA and some Democratic Organizations.
I only noted that the GOP's Attorney was involved to say that the GOP had a seat at the table when negotiating that settlement.

That does not mean I am saying that the Settlement Agreement modified the law itself and its fine since the GOP lawyer was there.
Only the Legislature can modify legislation.

What I am saying is that the Settlement Agreement did not modify the law. Certain guidelines and rules are often created as to how a particular law is carried out by the agency or office tasked with the job of carrying it out... it is those rules and guidelines (that the Sec State Office) had the legal authority to make and then modify.

Marx was a kraken man for way back in the. Day,?

Carlos marcs

Lol in a manner of speaking

@james j Savannah's okay as long as you don't go there on St Patrick's day

That's like hell on Earth

I see it when I go to Hilton Head.

The spyder bit was especially funny. This testimony seems to contain a bunch of screenshots of internet searches and ends with speculation that Dominion is compromised by rogue actors and accessible to hack.

@JD~Jordan. I understand your position and I disagree with it. Let see how the Courts Rule. I'm sure they will settle our disagreement.

Understood... but that's a different case than what is on the docket for Tuesday. The Kelly case is only challenging the constitutionality of Act 77 as originally enacted - and does not factor in the PA SC's sanctioning of the changes that SoS Boockvar prescribed in her efforts to ensure a safe/secure election.

@Zuluzeit I like Charleston

Sc

It’s a good party town @busillis

Then they just revealed his identity in the weird hearings