Message from @Kaiser
Discord ID: 785652111257763851
And that's assuming the adjudicaters are trained correctly in what to look for
Not that way... There are books at each polling place (it may vary by location) where each voter signs when they show up to vote. At the end of the day, the poll workers total up the number of people who showed up to vote - independent of the number of ballots cast. It's a check/balance to making sure that nobody stuffs the ballot box afterwards. Having copies of the voter rolls would not help with that.
She literally, physically watched 30,000 fraudulent counts.
Zuckerberg's involvement pre-dated the election by quite a few weeks.
@jfindley she was up for 24 hours for some reason and claimed she saw something that she her self gave a explanation for occurring. A ballot being jammed and the whole batch needing to be recounted
Yes, that is what she claimed... but her own math doesnt add up. She says in there a couple of times that individual ballots were being counting 9 to 10 times each.
Well, that sounds like an awful lot of watching, no?
She was discredited in a previous lawsuit where the judge singled out her testimony and referred to it as hearsay within hearsay. She keeps showing up with more to her story. She has to be playing them.
That's an awful lot of watching, yes. For someone as slow as her...
Lmao
LOL... well to be fair she was not a watcher... she was working for a Temp service and Dominion needed some additional "quality workers"
You're trolling us, aren't you?
Fastest scam ballot scanner in the business.
I just want trump to win
@obokima, you just advanced to level 1!
Honesty accounts for something?
I want a billion dollars!
Anyone know any good crypto discords
had to hide political discussion
You have to drink children's blood if that's what you want.
Yes but those seeing states should not certify with the given inconsistencies
If you did 1 scam ballot (and *only* scam ballots) per second, nonstop mind you, it would take over 8 hours to get 30,000.
We have four votes out of whack? Inconsistency.
thanks
@Kaiser, you just advanced to level 2!
The gop is in the best position they could've ever hoped for I frhey keep the senate
I'm just trying to discuss these things. I have no loyalties to anyone, and my main interest is in what actually happened in the 2020 election. I find it highly suspect that some allegedly fantastic lawyers, the POTUS himself, former military folks, and so on, are making claims such as these, and without having any basis with which to do so.
The whole situation is fascinating, and I think @RobertGrulerEsq discussing them is pretty entertaining.
If you consider that to be "me, trolling you", then I disagree, but don't cast any judgement. I'm not afraid to play devil's advocate, or to use my ~15 years of experience as a software engineer who enjoys knowing things he's "not supposed to know", to entertain some wild theories.
I know Texas law and procedures, and have been a Poll Watcher for a while. I'm not ashamed to say that most PWs are idiots, but they generally want to do the right thing, even though they have no idea what they're looking at.
Is this a main event or a side show
Doesn't sound right to me. Never developed election security protocols in my life but I am comfortable saying: Therefore inconsistencies.
@obokima I just want trump to lose, being that he is trying to destroy democracy under false pretenses
Long live the republic...
Long live the empire
That's a bit extreme, no.
Long live Hugo Chavez
mayy we all long live
Is biden not interested in preserving empire... No
Long live Hugo Chavez...