Message from @em
Discord ID: 785664579266412555
@Recalibar they weren’t counted three times. When a ballot jams you redo the batch (per mellisa carone) and if they were put through twice it would have seen in the 2 hand counts
@jfindley that’s a seed planted in the mind of many even before the election started. Now everyone sees fraud where there isn’t. Did you watch what I linked?
Yeah... Melissa is saying that she saw around 30,000 ballots counted multiple times. So even if the were ran just two more times than they should have been there would be 60,000 additional votes than ballots requested or submitted.
That simply didnt happen.
Maybe she did, but the whole thing is shady. That Democrat woman was pretty adamant about explaining how the video was "debunked" claiming the media had already discredited the affidavits before it even came out. It was the first time the video was ever seen. How could she know that? I'm partial to believing that she wouldn't have, but that was the party narritive to deny that fraud happened.
I'm gonna have to pause on wasting my time with you for a bit. I mean, I like this conversation, but if you don't even know who Ruby Freeman and her daughter are, then you're painfully ignorant of the facts in this case in GA, and probably the rest, too. I love you, guy, and I wish the best for you and everyone else, but my willingness to carry on this remedial degree of conversation is waning. I apologize, but I've got more important things to argue about with random strangers on the internet.
@Recalibar because they had a investigator watch hours of the video due to these nonsense accusations. Everything was done by law
People were there
It was debunked.... look at the link that @james j provided. A news crew sat in on a frame by frame explanation of that video.
A false narrative is easily dismissed @Recalibar
Where is the bathroom footage?
You can clearly see a woman, stand in front of the room. She leans back, as if shes about to start speaking to a group of people. She stands there for a moment, moving her arms. She goes out of frame. Shortly after, election workers/cutters leave, they’re done. Counters start to leave, packing things up, and its claimed thats how those ballots got there, under the table. They stop packing up. The observers leave. They wait. And then moments after everyone is out, they begin counting again. Phone calls or no phone calls to officials, this was wrong. Very wrong.
One day they will make election officials pee on tape for the people @busillis
LOL... yeah ok. Says the guy wanting people to prove a negative. That is ignorant as to how logic works.
Where were the official monitors during this act, though? Can you point them out? Can the media at least identify those workers and settle people's minds? I skipped to the part of the video where they discuss "frame by frame" but they also fail to address how she counted the same ballots multiple times. Why would they not be proactive about that observation if that's what was going on, and they truly reviewed the video?
@em yes a 20 second video of some vague thing (again people pre primed to believe anything they see is fraud) thinking they saw fraud is not evidence. It’s a fantasy that people come up with due to confirmation bias
I mean the ballots are anonymous once out of the envelope.
@Recalibar watch the video.
As I said, I did.
@Recalibar come back when you are done
It's very suspicious they are no coming off the bathroom footage, why?
Why would they not be proactive about recounting a stack of ballots?
Why would they not explain the process to the american people until after that observation was seen?
@Recalibar she didn’t count the same ballots three times
Ive seen clips of that yes
she did
These are narratives you created in your own mind that you want disproved. @Recalibar
@Recalibar they had a hand recount twice in GA
You can see that she did, in the full video. You yourself claimed she didn't recount them because there's a means to clear a ballot stack before rerunning. Why did the media not address this in their report?
woman on the far left can be seen, taking the same stack of ballots through the machine, and then re running the same exact stack
Things like this are important.
Also, if it's large enough, it allows us to show that procedure needs to be altered. Mail in ballots should be banned.
@Recalibar because they didn’t anticipate people seeing ghosts in video.
You can explain, or you can justify.
@Recalibar again she recounted them (apart for dealing with a jammed ballot that requires you do the batch all over again) it would have been spotted in the two hand recounts
the thing that irritates me is that you can see sterling getting more and more frustrated with his answers about this
Theres nothing to be frustrated about king
LOL..... oh so the "blond lady" I mentioned earlier.... LOL.... Sorry @jfindley I simply didnt known her name.
Again... this has ALLLLLL been debunked. Watch the video that @james j posted. Those were not suitcases.
No one told the watchers to go home.
Those ballots in those "suitcases" had already been removed from the envelopes which was when the signature matching takes place a second (techically a 3rd time)
LOLOLOL