Just gonna throw this here

https://www.eac.gov/voting-equipment/registered-manufacturers/sequoia-voting-systems-company-was-purchased-dominion

Smartmatic is separate from Dominion yes. however, after Smartmatic bought sequoia in the US, sequoia then went under. They were then bought by Dominion.
That happened after the CNN investigation of course, back when they did their job

After they filed Bankruptcy in 2014, their intellectual property was bought by Dominion according to both that .gov website, and other news outlets from around 2017

And from what I’ve gathered, Smartmatic remained responsible for sequoia even after that order was given

I think you are, but then again I might be too lol
Iirc, in 2010 the order was given to Smartmatic to dissolve its holding in Sequoia, due to security concerns, determined by CFIUS

Sequoia then went through a long process of dying out, and was attempted to be bought by Hart Inc, Hart learned and reported of their remaining connections to smartmatic, and then I think radio silence for a few years and then the public record shifts from sequoia to dominion

I think they’re posed as competitors, to put the tinfoil hat on

<https://maloney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/smartmatic-announces-sale-sequoia-voting-systems>
2007 - Smartmatic Sells

<https://web.archive.org/web/20100704220058if_/http://dominionvoting.com:80/images/pdfs/DominionAcquiresSequoiaFinal.pdf>
2010 Dominion buys

I would agree except the ballots are reprinted for the recounts so <a:aPES_Laugh:664885767574781964>

Only a signature audit would do it

Same to you

goodnight

goodmornin

Well, maybe not reprinted, but the signatures haven’t been verified during the audit. the audit just compares every ballot with what the machine counted

They sold* their assets

and then Dominion bought them

<https://www.huffpost.com/entry/exclusive-on-heels-of-die_b_620084>

> the matter of the true ownership of the intellectual property (IP) of Sequoia’s voting systems wasn’t at all what the company had represented to the public, to media, to election official customers, and even in courts of law.

> As part of a detailed investigative exposé series in 2008, as we broke the story of Hart Intercivic’s quietly attempted hostile takeover of Sequoia, we revealed the fact that — despite representations to the contrary, possibly even to U.S. government investigators — the IP for the vast-majority/near-entirety of Sequoia’s voting systems was actually secretly owned by the Hugo Chavez-tied, Venezuelan-based firm, Smartmatic.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/784693596061564969/video0.mp4

just throwing this here for those who wanna see this again maybe before i dip

Dominion bought them in 2010, this looks like it's from 2006

Lin wood claims this filing shows a direct paper trail from CCP to dominion <:thonk:746033093122719936> https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1827586/000182758620000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml

to the tune of 400mil

months before the election

Lin wood claims this filing shows a direct paper trail from CCP to dominion to the tune of 400million months before the election <:thonk:746033093122719936> https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1827586/000182758620000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml

Look at that Companies exec's

<https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/company/0849531D:US>

Stephen D Owens "Steve"

https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/company/1045239D:US

So yes, the form itself just shows the issuing (not even an IPO like you suggested) of 400mil in securities

They're private and 2/3 of their Execs are on Dominions board of share holders

the illegality stems from the idea that someone or something can pay that 400million, and the American people don't know who can get their hands in the pockets of their elections. It's not known if it's bought, for sure, but the possibility is enough. Why is this company asking for 400mil from private investors? If you know anything about global wealth, that's absolutely nothing in the eyes of a few wealthy investors somewhere in the world, so it's likely those securities were bought. The filing doesn't show that but I'm not even entirely sure when that was filed

or how recent it is

the dates show it was *months* before the election

If you can find who bought those securities ill be quiet. saying Dominion got 400million months before the election, by some private entity, and being worried about that *because my guy lost?* is a ridiculous fallacy. Sorry thats a bit concerning regardless if its illegal or not. If you can confirm that whoever paid that 400 million isnt a foreign entity then cool

https://youtu.be/9U-McnkIFZs skip to like 33:00 if u want the clip

i don’t think hes stoking violence tbfh

Everytime i hear Raffensperger or Sterling speak and they warned “someones gonna get shot,”

seems sus

Look you can say its fake all you want but any logical cross examiner wouldve put these people on the stand already instead of silencing them entirely

Lmao what are you guys talking about these people have signed affidavits literally saying “HEY ILL GO UNDER OATH AND SAY THIS TOOOO!”

*hardly* been silenced when all you hear from mainstream media is a game of telephone invalidating their claims

You can clearly see a woman, stand in front of the room. She leans back, as if shes about to start speaking to a group of people. She stands there for a moment, moving her arms. She goes out of frame. Shortly after, election workers/cutters leave, they’re done. Counters start to leave, packing things up, and its claimed thats how those ballots got there, under the table. They stop packing up. The observers leave. They wait. And then moments after everyone is out, they begin counting again. Phone calls or no phone calls to officials, this was wrong. Very wrong.

I’m referring to the “frame by frame analysis,” bucko

Ive seen clips of that yes

she did

woman on the far left can be seen, taking the same stack of ballots through the machine, and then re running the same exact stack

the thing that irritates me is that you can see sterling getting more and more frustrated with his answers about this

Theres nothing to be frustrated about king

When did i say suitcases lmao

I said something different can u read

I genuinely cant tell if you’re being serious or not but this is what i said. I never said a woman with blonde braids or anything. Im literally going off of what i see

They claim: specifically: someone told them

bro again you didnt read a word i said lmao

you’re literally a Bot

Its like you cant read than one more sentence with “woman stands in front of room ready to give statement,” DEBUNKED. FALSE.

You can clearly see a woman, stand in front of the room. She leans back, as if shes about to start speaking to a group of people. She stands there for a moment, moving her arms. She goes out of frame. Shortly after, election workers/cutters leave, they’re done. Counters start to leave, packing things up, and its claimed thats how those ballots got there, under the table. They stop packing up. The observers leave. They wait. And then moments after everyone is out, they begin counting again. Phone calls or no phone calls to officials, this was wrong. Very wrong.

based off of the frame by frame analysis, not trumps analysis

Oh don’t forget the time they said they “already showed the video” to observers after leaving.

reported by fox.

Oh thats a great video

Ballots with no addresses

Very great stuff

In a cubicle

I also, sorry if i offend anyone here, but i **do not give a shit about the boxes they were in.** they kept counting after **misleading** honest americans

It doesnt say may not

Ah yes confused. All of them. and all of them signing affidavits. Confused.

<:KEKW:648883104345358337>

Ive heard this argument, and i raise you the fact that miscommunication can happen, to the fact that after its discovered to be exactly that, you don’t continue misunderstanding

or miscommunicating

you don’t just continue going because oh

we werent supposed to stop

go get the people who left

They’re not gone

James im gonna block u

that is a shitty argument and you know it

Over and over again yes

Law statute

They mean more than press releases

Are those officials signing affidavits

Socialism is evil lol