Message from @JD~Jordan
Discord ID: 785664258750677002
Im not sure what you are trying to establish. CISA was the agency under Homeland Security tasked with protecting our election (and many other things) from cyber attack. In a joint statement with other agencies they stated that it was the most secure election in American history. Now, I think that language is too colorful... but the point is... they found nothing.
I would be for publishing scans of ballots ... assuming it could be done with keeping the ballots secret
A majority, including the media, and the poll watchers. In the video, there were 7 people on staff. Four counters, 3 for oversight. Maybe you can reason there's a dem and rep poll watcher and one election official, but I'm partial to those three likely being elections officials given the affidavits, and the fact that a stack of ballots were counted three times in succession.
@jfindley it’s a ridiculous request. Unverifiable affidavits mean nothing to determining a truth.
You use the video to verify the affidavits.
I mean, that's what we're looking at, isn't it? There can be NO FAITH in our election system as it stands.
I dont even know who that is....
Let me know if I am wrong...
You are asserting that poll workers told some Republican Poll Watchers to leave... either by ordering them to do so or telling them that all the counting was done for the night.
That is an affirmative claim. I am simply asking what is your evidence to support that?
@Recalibar they weren’t counted three times. When a ballot jams you redo the batch (per mellisa carone) and if they were put through twice it would have seen in the 2 hand counts
@jfindley that’s a seed planted in the mind of many even before the election started. Now everyone sees fraud where there isn’t. Did you watch what I linked?
Yeah... Melissa is saying that she saw around 30,000 ballots counted multiple times. So even if the were ran just two more times than they should have been there would be 60,000 additional votes than ballots requested or submitted.
That simply didnt happen.
Maybe she did, but the whole thing is shady. That Democrat woman was pretty adamant about explaining how the video was "debunked" claiming the media had already discredited the affidavits before it even came out. It was the first time the video was ever seen. How could she know that? I'm partial to believing that she wouldn't have, but that was the party narritive to deny that fraud happened.
I'm gonna have to pause on wasting my time with you for a bit. I mean, I like this conversation, but if you don't even know who Ruby Freeman and her daughter are, then you're painfully ignorant of the facts in this case in GA, and probably the rest, too. I love you, guy, and I wish the best for you and everyone else, but my willingness to carry on this remedial degree of conversation is waning. I apologize, but I've got more important things to argue about with random strangers on the internet.
@Recalibar because they had a investigator watch hours of the video due to these nonsense accusations. Everything was done by law
People were there
It was debunked.... look at the link that @james j provided. A news crew sat in on a frame by frame explanation of that video.
A false narrative is easily dismissed @Recalibar
Where is the bathroom footage?
You can clearly see a woman, stand in front of the room. She leans back, as if shes about to start speaking to a group of people. She stands there for a moment, moving her arms. She goes out of frame. Shortly after, election workers/cutters leave, they’re done. Counters start to leave, packing things up, and its claimed thats how those ballots got there, under the table. They stop packing up. The observers leave. They wait. And then moments after everyone is out, they begin counting again. Phone calls or no phone calls to officials, this was wrong. Very wrong.
One day they will make election officials pee on tape for the people @busillis
LOL... yeah ok. Says the guy wanting people to prove a negative. That is ignorant as to how logic works.
Where were the official monitors during this act, though? Can you point them out? Can the media at least identify those workers and settle people's minds? I skipped to the part of the video where they discuss "frame by frame" but they also fail to address how she counted the same ballots multiple times. Why would they not be proactive about that observation if that's what was going on, and they truly reviewed the video?
@em yes a 20 second video of some vague thing (again people pre primed to believe anything they see is fraud) thinking they saw fraud is not evidence. It’s a fantasy that people come up with due to confirmation bias
I mean the ballots are anonymous once out of the envelope.
@Recalibar watch the video.
As I said, I did.
@Recalibar come back when you are done
I’m referring to the “frame by frame analysis,” bucko
It's very suspicious they are no coming off the bathroom footage, why?
Why would they not be proactive about recounting a stack of ballots?
Why would they not explain the process to the american people until after that observation was seen?
@Recalibar she didn’t count the same ballots three times
Ive seen clips of that yes
she did
These are narratives you created in your own mind that you want disproved. @Recalibar
@Recalibar they had a hand recount twice in GA
You can see that she did, in the full video. You yourself claimed she didn't recount them because there's a means to clear a ballot stack before rerunning. Why did the media not address this in their report?
woman on the far left can be seen, taking the same stack of ballots through the machine, and then re running the same exact stack
Things like this are important.
Also, if it's large enough, it allows us to show that procedure needs to be altered. Mail in ballots should be banned.