Also, if it's large enough, it allows us to show that procedure needs to be altered. Mail in ballots should be banned.

@Recalibar because they didn’t anticipate people seeing ghosts in video.

You can explain, or you can justify.

@Recalibar again she recounted them (apart for dealing with a jammed ballot that requires you do the batch all over again) it would have been spotted in the two hand recounts

the thing that irritates me is that you can see sterling getting more and more frustrated with his answers about this

Theres nothing to be frustrated about king

LOL..... oh so the "blond lady" I mentioned earlier.... LOL.... Sorry @jfindley I simply didnt known her name.

Again... this has ALLLLLL been debunked. Watch the video that @james j posted. Those were not suitcases.

No one told the watchers to go home.

Those ballots in those "suitcases" had already been removed from the envelopes which was when the signature matching takes place a second (techically a 3rd time)

LOLOLOL

When did i say suitcases lmao

@Recalibar you can also see what your mind wants to see and ignore alternative explanations other than fraud. This is what most people are doing who claim fraud

Its what Team Trump said in the hearing

I said something different can u read

Most these people watching these videos have no idea what they are looking at so they just assume everything is fraud

Is the container important to your position or are you just being petty?

Yeah there would be two things to check one is to count the envelopes versus the mail in ballots assuming you can distinguish mail in ballots from in-person ballots which I think you can in Georgia and the other would be to do some spot checking on the signatures.

So because it wasn't in a suitcase, they didn't tell observers to leave and keep counting? Cause they kept counting. And we have affidavits saying observers were told to leave, and zero affidavits saying they weren't told to leave.

One unallocated vote, extremely massive fraud.

I genuinely cant tell if you’re being serious or not but this is what i said. I never said a woman with blonde braids or anything. Im literally going off of what i see

Watch carefully as she loads the same stack three times.

@DrSammyD they heard an announcement that the workers could go home. They took that as the poll watchers had to leave

NO.... But Team Trump called it a suitcase so that is what I called it. They used that term to make it sound more nefarious.

Again.... I DID NOT CALL them suitcases.... Team Trump did

@Recalibar that video as been explained , I’m not sure why you keep persisting with it

Again, no affidavit claims that.

Ruby is the lady with the Blond braids... that is the term Team Trump used to describe her. I had simply never heard her name.

They claim: specifically: someone told them

Get over it

Explained by a media with a vested interest in obscuring the truth.

bro again you didnt read a word i said lmao

you’re literally a Bot

Idk how you can watch that video and not think "Damn, she just finessed the entire state of Georgia."

People will just listen to any narrative overlaid on top of a video and because it satisfies your desire to see fraud and they assume there is fraud

Its like you cant read than one more sentence with “woman stands in front of room ready to give statement,” DEBUNKED. FALSE.

Sworn testimony* FTFY

The affadavits came forward before the video. The video justifies the claims made by the affidavits. Easy.

@Recalibar everything was on tape . Most workers were asked to leave. The poll watchers for confused. They had a election investigator watch hours of footage yet no one is satisfied. They just want to hear what the want to hear.

@Recalibar yes the affidavits of people being confused

You can clearly see a woman, stand in front of the room. She leans back, as if shes about to start speaking to a group of people. She stands there for a moment, moving her arms. She goes out of frame. Shortly after, election workers/cutters leave, they’re done. Counters start to leave, packing things up, and its claimed thats how those ballots got there, under the table. They stop packing up. The observers leave. They wait. And then moments after everyone is out, they begin counting again. Phone calls or no phone calls to officials, this was wrong. Very wrong.

Why did the poll watchers and the media leave? Why did the poll watchers submit affidavits claiming they were asked to leave before having knowledge of the video?

Sworn testimony is garbage if there is nothing to verify

All bs aside security cameras rarely tell the story, typically you cannot look at the video and find it unless you already know about it, even then you may not find what you are looking for.