PA state response and Trump's intervention have been added to SCOTUS case file.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

Look up bernies views on China both on their own polices and trade with the US @dnindustry

Will Trump argue the case himself?

Technically everything is responsible to federal compliance and to comply federally the state has to follow its own constitution. I dont think that's controlling. It can be changed by each state by using its own legislature

Yes it is up to each State to determine. That determination can not violate the US Constitution that has granted them that authority. That is the Legal Question before the US Supreme Court now.

https://jonathanturley.org/2020/12/09/krebs-files-lawsuit-against-digenova-the-trump-campaign-and-newsmax/. Peter's principal

@Mandy I saw this on mugclub. That's why even if trump gets f'd his biggest savior of the US will be removing 230. Has to happen

@dnindustry, you just advanced to level 2!

@William Dinan They are going to punt that case.

Mayor Pete is going to be ambassador to China under Biden.

I thought they were claiming violations of state Constitutions. The US Constitution says leave it to the individual states not let some states inject their opinion in others

CIA Pete

The radical right hasn't thought through this 230 thing. Mark my words.

Maybe. It is a Hail Mary IMO. Time will Tell.

Tickety tock

@james j of course she didnt say it was rigged. It would be an admission of guilt!!!

Norwegian countries use a wonderfully treated workforce.

That Supreme Court has done stranger things in the Past. My Crystal Ball is Cloudy now.

Norwegians are weird though. @Doc

That's fine

@Dedkraken And Norway has a state oil industry

And a small population

@Dedkraken yeah but the amount of Nokia and ludafisk we import is rather low

Just quickly read through Trump's filing (his lawyer of record is about 15 minutes from where I live). His "Prayer for Relief" could not have been more aptly named.

@dnindustry I think everyone had a Nokia Phone at one time

@dnindustry

Lol

https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1571#:~:text=n.,of%20a%20complaint%20or%20petition.

prayer

n. the specific request for judgment, relief and/or damages at the conclusion of a complaint or petition.

What does import have to do with it? You said what communist producer has a well treated workforce. Sweden makes products they need. Their workers are treated well. They trade with their neighbors.

You do know that is a Legal Term meaning "Permission"?

@TaLoN132 i got you one upped. Kyle Rittenhouses current lawyer Mark Richard's is 3 blocks away and an acquaintance.
I recently was asking my exposure to mispronoun ing bearded females that are cis

There are trade offs in volume

My favorite legal document verbiage "now comes XYZ" sounds triumphantly marching into Valhalla

YouTube blog on censorship regarding the Safe Harbor period with Biden president elect and reliance on "authoritarian" news sources pointing to CISA for "fact-checking."

https://t.co/kjpcWTevyd

Interesting trivia. Can anyone guess my ancestor?
They met a pair of native inhabitants looking for directions. The natives pointed to the Village and said what was as heard as 'Kanada' . My ancestor misunderstood it as the entire land they were on.
Who was it? I just found out a few weeks ago

https://www.tomsguide.com/news/facebook-hit-with-antitrust-lawsuits-what-it-means-for-instagram-and-whatsapp?utm_source=notification

Media would have skinned him alive if he would have tried to intervene in any of the unconstitutional legislature or appoint people at the hundreds of ballot boxes. Also, how would one go about knowing which dead people or nursing home patients DNC would select which was gamed out and every possible narrative baked and ready to feed the public. It's like any logical conclusion bordering prophesy...you are helpless to prevent something that essentially is a thought processes or prememptive accusation. Tell someone and risk sounding crazy until it actually occurs.

The best time to worry about a corrupt system is 1913. The next best time is 1971.
The next next best time is now.

For the brazen act of asking for a reelection in the swing states solidifies the notion of confidence in outcomes. If some sort of ploy to rile up the base then reelection would never be considered just like the fake "we did it Joe" sound in Harris's voice then silence. No rebuttal.