The campaigns would likely have very accurate polling data.@james j

Exactly.

The cases were heard you just blame your opponents for presenting junk 😅

*Finally, if original jurisdiction is allowed, this type of litigation will crowdthe Court’s docketevery four years. Given the global pandemic, many States were forced to modify their election process, including mail-in voting procedures. Texas did.7And most, if not every, state has been sued during this election.Texas has.*

This is hilarious, lol.

Context?

Or at least page # 🙏🏼

There is a distinction... I can allege anything about anyone. I can allege that my neighbor is a serial killer because I saw him leaving his house at odd hours and taking things into his shed at night in a sneaky manner. That allegation means nothing without actual proof.

>rejected on laches
>many rejected on grounds of not being the offended party

That's not being heard.

without evidence*

> in any event, are barred by laches,
lol, the laches catch-22 again.

> and are moot, meritless,
so they say

> and dangerous.
It's very dangerous to call speech or allegations dangerous.

> Texas has not suffered harm simply because it dislikes the result of the election
Conjecture on motive [directly contradictory to stated motive], gross.

I just want to hear the cases. 🤷🏻‍♂️ Too much to ask?

Yes it is. They could have presented better cases not dismissed by such things but they didnt 🤷

Apparently so.

If Trumps legal team made good faith lawsuits they would have been heard

???

Perhaps that was never the intention.

@yetiCodes you heard their low quality arguments in the hearings. The mellisa carone lady was heard by the court and found to be non credible

I have not read or seen anything put forward in the Trump, Trump Campaign, Powell, Wood, etc. lawsuits that were anything other than allegations. If they had any substance, they would be able to point to arrests made. You mean to tell me that not one law enforcement officer supported Trump enough to investigate fraud and pursue any fraud cases?

There was no proof in the hearing just more allegations @yetiCodes

🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

>Video evidence isn't proof

Man, it's the OJ case all over again.

"If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit!"

How do you investigate things that are unverifiable @yetiCodes like I said the state witnesses was deemed not credible by the court and she was heard there

We disagree on this and neither of us will budge, so let’s move on from this one.

Criminal cases would have to have a much higher bar of evidence than civil.

The video was doctored.

LOL

Clearly 😂

How can you disagree that nothing was proven or verifiable @yetiCodes

> Perhaps that was never the intention.
@busillis Still right there with you. Also still can't figure out how any of it works tactically.

The video wasnt doctored it just followed the official investigations version of events.

The video was investigated and found no malfeasance or mystery ballots. @yetiCodes how did you miss out on this key part surrounding the video @Starscraper

Just remember, if he's robbed, video evidence, witnesses, audio recordings, and anomalous activity of the suspects are all "not evidence" in his case.

It was like a bad lip reading video. They simply overlayed the context they desired.

I’m just poking fun at the “no evidence ever” camp.

Trumps team wanted to present an alternative theory as to the version of events

They haven't stood up to the lowest bar... as asserted by the judge in the NV case last week. This was after reviewing actual testimony from affiants and experts under oath and cross examination.

There was no robbery in the video. You are just seeing people doing their job and interpreting it as fraud . Like I said did you see the results of that investigation @Starscraper

One of those versions was more credible 😂

If SCOTUS hears this case, will any of that be live-streamed?

@james j Correct. The proper comparison would be claiming that the video showed a kidnapping or something, with witnesses etc.