That requires signature verification

Which is part of the Texas suit, that many states didn't do signature verification

Criminal investigation? They're not even hearing much lower standard of evidence cases on merits.

"If they find a legitimate case"

Pretty hard to do if you have to prove something before you can investigate.

Lol

No legitimate cases, huh? I guess all those hearings I listened to for... 18+ hours were really nothing, huh?

It doesn't go anywhere when there's no signature verification and nobody acts on addresses listing empty lots and strip malls.

Did anyone other than OAN even cover all the hearings?

Also "fact checkers" in media checked the wrong list in at least one instance.

There's been a few, apparently.

Well there you go

So? They're just the tip of the iceberg of hundreds upon hundreds of affidavits that are essentially oath. If only 20% hold up under cross-examination, that's still a huge number.

Here's a fun thought exercise: what do you think it would look like if fraud did happen, and if it didn't?

Under threat of purjury?

Legally binding?

Can you not get in serious legal trouble if you lie on one?

Were they "few and far between", or were they "not fraud if accurate", pick one.

I wasted far too much time listening to so many hearings to not throw my experience in to object and say there were definitely legitimate claims, and I'll also add that intimidation, harassment, and wrongfully / in a biased manner throwing out challengers and observers are **serious** misconduct that cannot be overlooked and should not be downplayed.

A challenger who is afraid of getting dragged out of the building is not going to be able to effectively challenge votes, and that will have a material effect on a disparity of rejection rates between each party.

In fact, I recall some of the witnesses were challengers saying they were intimidated to the point where they were not able to perform their duties (for fear of being removed if they challenged too many votes).

> Their job is not...

No, but that is not at all what happened in every one of those cases, either.

> Yeah Lin Woods a lunatic. Martial law is bad.

I'm not so sure it wouldn't be worse than _this_.

This gaslighting and censorship is turning to anger and fury in a lot of Americans.

"Most secure elections in history"

If only it were the electorate

> Court cases where also trumps lawyers claims mysteriously change when they could get disbarred or jailed or lying.
Don't knowingly spread this lie. That was a quote from a case that wasn't about fraud, so of course they didn't allege it in that one.

Lol, they never claim rigged elections

They [dictatorships] rig the elections then censor anyone from questioning them

And who's doing that?

Can't steal what was stolen from you

And yeah, not hard for courts not to get what was in the hearings when the courts don't even hear the merits of the vast majority of cases

Conjecture. I'd might as well conjecture that you're working for the Dems to steal the election

It's nonsense and needlessly inflammatory

They are

No

Trump called fraud

Media said he was weird for calling his own election rigged

He was ignored

Lol

I weep because you mock what is true, in a sense

He couldn't appoint his own head of FBI

Do you deny that?

It should never be blindly trusted

The FBI has been chasing a conspiracy theory for 4 years, but we can't even look into our elections when Trump loses - only when he wins.

As for research I've spent probably 20-40 hours in the last 8 or 9 days on it. So don't pull a "I've researched this more" on me.

I'm aware. But the devil is always in the details.

Are you aware they found USB drives of thousands of uncounted votes when they did? And how unprecedented that is?

YOU DO NOT DO THAT WITH VOTES

You have no idea how unprecedented that is for votes to find in a recount, do you?

Of that magnitude, yes.

Every recount changes by hundreds, max.

Thousands was insane.

Don't misrepresent what I said.

It never happens in the thousands.

It does happen, in hundreds.

But not on this scale.

Also, as @Fefe brought up

Biden sure broke a lot of records.

Best president ever.

UK ministers were going against a candidate who won Florida, Iowa and Ohio?

Lol

Oh man, but ours are invincible, huh?

@jfindley I'd normally be more skeptical of this stuff, but man... not after this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWse6ykCxRw

> Lol saying that "We do it too" is not a sound argument
The difference is, we didn't have a Steel dossier done by compromised sources and paid for by one of the parties.

Instead we have overwhelming evidence

That they cherry pick the worst of and say that represents all of it

And ignore the real stuff, of course.

@Fefe in 1 month we have more than they ever got in 4 years despite all their money and subpoenas and power

> This is the most accurate meme I have found. I hope people realize Trump had just been fleecing his own supporters for as of now 200 million dollars

This is the sort of inflammatory thing you should refrain from if you want this country to ever recover - or at least to not escalate this even further.

We have it on video

But it's never enough, is it?

It never will be

You don't know about the "suitcase gate" thing, or are you gaslighting again?

If you can "lol" at THAT, then you are not worth talking to.

Weeks ago. Hard to believe given it's not that old.

We should frankly ban foreigners.

They're just stoking and inciting.

They have no reason to be here and do this other than to escalate tensions in the US

Kick'em out.

This is an internal affair.

You're just inflaming things with mockery.

Not your election

Not your election

We had a revolutionary war and now we have democracy instead of a monarchy.

Not your election

Not your election

Our ancestors?

Over what our ancestors did?

Of course you will, you hate free speech, after all.

Not your election

It does, though?

It means not getting arrested or censored

Well, you've made it obvious you'll attack me on a personal level, so it's not safe to talk to you.

Flagging me for a comment about history

I'm glad we had a revolutionary war

Now democracy is a thing.

Do you hate democracy?

Or maybe you liked the old kings?

Me, too. Go worry about your own elections.

Good for you. You should spend all this time learning about your system

"Either the Constitution matters or it is just a piece of paper in the national archives"

This says 21. Another source said 18. I'm not sure what the count is right now, but this is uh... shaping up. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/720094663217905774/786511791659155466/1607588884862.png

But nah, I'm sure 21 states are just insane, delusional Trump supporters, right?

Write your Attorney General. Start a petition to your Attorney General. More likely you just need to find the active one.