I just want to hear the cases. 🤷🏻‍♂️ Too much to ask?

Yes it is. They could have presented better cases not dismissed by such things but they didnt 🤷

Apparently so.

If Trumps legal team made good faith lawsuits they would have been heard

???

Perhaps that was never the intention.

@yetiCodes you heard their low quality arguments in the hearings. The mellisa carone lady was heard by the court and found to be non credible

I have not read or seen anything put forward in the Trump, Trump Campaign, Powell, Wood, etc. lawsuits that were anything other than allegations. If they had any substance, they would be able to point to arrests made. You mean to tell me that not one law enforcement officer supported Trump enough to investigate fraud and pursue any fraud cases?

There was no proof in the hearing just more allegations @yetiCodes

🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

>Video evidence isn't proof

Man, it's the OJ case all over again.

"If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit!"

How do you investigate things that are unverifiable @yetiCodes like I said the state witnesses was deemed not credible by the court and she was heard there

We disagree on this and neither of us will budge, so let’s move on from this one.

Criminal cases would have to have a much higher bar of evidence than civil.

The video was doctored.

LOL

Clearly 😂

How can you disagree that nothing was proven or verifiable @yetiCodes

> Perhaps that was never the intention.
@busillis Still right there with you. Also still can't figure out how any of it works tactically.

The video wasnt doctored it just followed the official investigations version of events.

The video was investigated and found no malfeasance or mystery ballots. @yetiCodes how did you miss out on this key part surrounding the video @Starscraper

Just remember, if he's robbed, video evidence, witnesses, audio recordings, and anomalous activity of the suspects are all "not evidence" in his case.

It was like a bad lip reading video. They simply overlayed the context they desired.

I’m just poking fun at the “no evidence ever” camp.

Trumps team wanted to present an alternative theory as to the version of events

They haven't stood up to the lowest bar... as asserted by the judge in the NV case last week. This was after reviewing actual testimony from affiants and experts under oath and cross examination.

There was no robbery in the video. You are just seeing people doing their job and interpreting it as fraud . Like I said did you see the results of that investigation @Starscraper

One of those versions was more credible 😂

If SCOTUS hears this case, will any of that be live-streamed?

@james j Correct. The proper comparison would be claiming that the video showed a kidnapping or something, with witnesses etc.

I love the "oFfIcIaL iNvEsTiGaTiOn" where all the press and GOP workers were told to leave the room and corroborating media reports from the time say the center closed but then they pulled crates of ballots from a hidden spot under a table out to count for hours after everyone was gone.

Love it. I should do one of those late-night "no opposition present" tabulating parties next election if they're so legal and legit.

Does violation of Election Laws require Intent or are they Strict Liability Based?

Lol. I want to join team “no evidence exists ever” just so I can be a full-time devil’s advocate.

@yetiCodes, you just advanced to level 12!

If you tell people so and so is a drunk for months and then you show someone a video of them drinking a clear liquid, (if they trust, and want to believe you, as Trump has done to his base with faux voter fraud) you make be more prone to believe that person is drinking vodka when in reality they are just drinking water @Starscraper

Months of planting with his seed.

No honest person can watch that video and say it's not at least highly suspect.

No honest person.

Lmao

Damn! "Texas liter-ally seeks to decimate the electorate of the United States"