Message from @Darkangael
Discord ID: 787047888852746250
@TaLoN132 explain why a voting machine would have a weighted race feature ?
there is no compelling evidence that they happened
Like Phil just mentioned weighted races are in the manual, that in my opinion is at least circumstantial evidence.
@meglide you would need to see the source code of the machine to say for sure. i dont expect them to display fractions on the machine
why wouldn't it? voting machines would be used for lots of different things, supposed you wanted share holders to vote their shares and some shares are weighted differently than others?
Where's the AI that will end all human error in elections
Technology!
so what
@Phil and @Darkangael my car has the ability to exceed the speed limit ... is that proof that I've done so?
Prove that you didn't, bro. That's the test.
Lol
Jk
No, only proof that you could have.
no more innocent until proven guilty
i think that's a bunch of melarky anyway
> no more innocent until proven guilty
@nainani Totally. We should jettison that superfluous principle.
the point is you cant prove you didnt and i cant prove you did. normally you would have to assume your innocence. but it is not the only circumstantial element.
Having or Proving the Capabilities may be a Discovery Issue to examine the machines?
@Darkangael, you just advanced to level 4!
affidavits?
or recount the ballots manually like they did in GA? would that be sufficient?
Mr. Marx prefers to make laws not be subject to the laws of others.
speeding is a civil penalty far as I know
Maybe we should get a gigantic pile of belligerent zealots to claim there was no malfeasance. Maybe even a preponderance making pile of them.
Would need a forensic audit at this point and there are some number of votes that cannot be recounted not sure what would be the remedy for that.
Yes! Let's go technology!
you can recount the paper all you want but that is not going to reveal all the types of fraud that is being alleged.
Data is the truth
all the votes in GA have a paper copy and could be and were recounted by hand
> you can recount the paper all you want but that is not going to reveal all the types of fraud that is being alleged.
@Phil Sounds like the people making extraordinary claims have some extraordinary work to do.
Computer software can be altered to do just about anything? What does it actually prove?
where does the paper copy come from?
you alleged fractional voting due to ability of the machines to do ... what's your next allegation?
I have been architecting and building database solutions for the Entertainment and Aerospace industries for more than 20 years. I work on Intellectual Property rights systems which are used to manage inordinate amounts of information tracking the financial lifetime. I have worked on Theatrical and Exhibitor management systems. I designed and implemented solutions for the Motion Picture Association to collect and analyze world-wide box office data. We are talking about systems that manage theater attendance for movies that are used to feed financial systems to calculate potential income and analyze the factors in determining a movie's potential value in subsequent weeks during an engagement. These systems are basically the equivalent of an election performed each night where patrons are voters and the tickets they buy are ballots. These systems manage sensitive financial relationship data and are used in the audited box office figures that then become the account of record for settling any outstanding issues. All of this is not to flex, it's to communicate that this is my personal area of professional expertise... and I have serious reservations about the data analysis that was done using the NYT data and other published data sets.
A system? Also don't system have the code of all transactions? All commands and actions that occurred? A data set that tells what was executed into that system? A LOG that's the word I'm looking for haha