you alleged fractional voting due to ability of the machines to do ... what's your next allegation?

@Zuluzeit yeah they have a lot to proove

@meglide why are they my allegations?

I have been architecting and building database solutions for the Entertainment and Aerospace industries for more than 20 years. I work on Intellectual Property rights systems which are used to manage inordinate amounts of information tracking the financial lifetime. I have worked on Theatrical and Exhibitor management systems. I designed and implemented solutions for the Motion Picture Association to collect and analyze world-wide box office data. We are talking about systems that manage theater attendance for movies that are used to feed financial systems to calculate potential income and analyze the factors in determining a movie's potential value in subsequent weeks during an engagement. These systems are basically the equivalent of an election performed each night where patrons are voters and the tickets they buy are ballots. These systems manage sensitive financial relationship data and are used in the audited box office figures that then become the account of record for settling any outstanding issues. All of this is not to flex, it's to communicate that this is my personal area of professional expertise... and I have serious reservations about the data analysis that was done using the NYT data and other published data sets.

A system? Also don't system have the code of all transactions? All commands and actions that occurred? A data set that tells what was executed into that system? A LOG that's the word I'm looking for haha

> @Zuluzeit yeah they have a lot to proove
@Phil They have claimed they had overwhelming proof from the jump. All we've seen is dubious hearings and more elaborate claims as bandaids for the garbage ones they are locked into.

Preponderance of the 💩 that's the capital idea, Mr Marx.

I think we all should agree that if fraud is present it should be addressed regardless of who ultimately wins.

oh man, okay never mind. I just feel like there's some center where all data goes to

don't know ... I'm content to say the election is fair absent of compelling evidence that fraud has occurred. Are you? ... note I would define compelling evidence as evidence presented in court that compels a judge to rule that fraud has indeed occurred

but if it isn't so it isn't so ha

@Zuluzeit yes i agree they have made a lot of elaborate claims, but a significant proportion are coming from the citizens of the states themselves

Depends on what the examinations found or discovered.

@busillis I have pre-pondered this. Only answer: Qaliens

@meglide yes i tend to agree, 2 months ago i would have never thought it possible. the things they have shown highlight that it is certainly possible, whether it happened they will have to prove with substantial evidence

thank you for sharing the link. see page 25, paragraph 85. for the complaint regarding the online application. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07%20FINAL.pdf

baha I just turned wisconsin election fraud hearing on and first thing I hear "Kanye West!"

WAIT IS THE CALL BEING STEAMED

Hahahaha

Did anyone notice how in Chicago Bernie got more votes than trump!?

In my personal experience I know that ballots went missing my grandmother asked for one twice and never received one once, my hubby was told to spoil his ballot and the machine took it anyway. Anecdotalsure but all influencing why I am suspicious.

GUYS THE CALL OF THE scotus JUDGES IS IT BEING STEAMED

If the Respondents/Defendants are in Control and Custody of the Evidence. A Order for Discovery would be required.

don’t think i replied to you, instead commented new. i may give up on this discord thing, can’t figure out how to keep track of convos! anyhow see pg 25. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07%20FINAL.pdf

@William Dinan i think they have some discovery in the NV or MI case, i forget which. they were granted some access to the machines for an audit?

From experience (and this is total speculation), developers will often add features to make things simpler for testing certain operations. In my systems, I make sure that these non-functional features are never available to the end users. However, developers that are working on screens or reports will often want to create different scenarios using whatever data is in the system. Being able to manipulate data in the system could be used to test report output, test certain screen functionality, and such. I have not seen the administration screens from the DVS system, but if they did have those functions exposed and available to the end user, it shows laziness and would be an indicator to me of sloppy coding practices. I have very high coding standards on my projects, so I feel that way about most development projects that I have evaluated in the past.

> GUYS THE CALL OF THE scotus JUDGES IS IT BEING STEAMED
@Scott McHarris where?

@Zuluzeit not sure

@TaLoN132 interesting. i get what you mean to exercise the system but then disable it when it is depolyed

Discord is very much like Microsoft Teams in concept.

what's possible and what happened are two different items ... fraud is possible but the point of election security measures is to prevent it from happening and catch it when it does ... role of courts is to adjudicate allegations of election fraud ... so far I've been impressed by how well each is doing their job

> @Zuluzeit not sure
@Darkangael :(

And Slack...

@x96petersen1 don't give up just takes getting used to

@meglide yes but remember that only a few months ago they were talking about having the most secure election system in history. clearly this is not the case if we are to believe some of the witness statements

Do you think voter fraud experts would leave a trail?

thank you for the encouragement @Darkangael and for the tips!!

Thanks... I appreciate it.

Never used slack. I've heard a lot of people sing its praises though.

I'm not sure.

and why should we believe them if the courts have yet to find them believable?