This is my thought as well. That the voting system itself was providing information to some nefarious actors.

I went looking for your comments on YT and you raise some good points. It's not whether I or anyone else agrees with you, but these same arguments could very well come up in court and a bullet-proof case is necessary to prevail.

As a computer professional, I do not believe that to be a secure method, no matter how it's done.

Touche. For me, I assume those risks and have a reasonable amount of trust in the backend systems employed to provide those services. I also know that neither of those services you mentioned have had a single year there was not a report of fraudulent activity in some capacity.

I get that the technology is available and could be put to use to do online voting. I don't think it's ready for prime time and correct implementation of a system that is bullet-proof is a must.

https://trustthevote.org/

About halfway down the page in the "What's an Audit?" section

We don’t trust computers to decide election results!

@doc isn't covid from the same family as the common cold?

Sounds like a moving target

Dog whisperer?

If you're human, you're probably biased.

2012 conservatives were lame. I felt like I was throwing my vote away. Conservatives, all too often, just go along to get along. I want someone that is going to speak for me, not roll over. I don't agree with putting Trump on a pedestal. He's human and will make mistakes. The Trump cult is detestable.

"feature"

I love it when programmers call intentional bugs "features"

Discord is very much like Microsoft Teams in concept.

Never used slack. I've heard a lot of people sing its praises though.

The video from Wednesday is still there. How do you think it's censored?

Took way too long for them to get onboard with the idea.

Yeah, we need first - hand info for it to be credible and even then it's debatable.