Message from @SoonMrWick
Discord ID: 787766406904545290
Needs to be golden. Tremendous option.
Don't poop emoji my posts. Wth is the matter with you?
Hi!π
You have to do this π« π©
I dont think it is right to call them baseless, sure they are not specific enough to win in a court at the moment. But they do have some basis for their allegations. the GA one filed friday is certainly closer to having specific allocations which wan be proved either way
> You have to do this π« π©
@Cali La La lol Thanks! I love you.
Seemed like a lot of stalling patch work while they get one they're really hoping will do the trick
I don't understand why these judges won't release the findings of this audit either... either way, the people should be able to know. If everything was legit... fine... but either way, we should be able to see that something was done, and these are the results.
I was showing you antipoo π πΌββοΈπ©... @Cali La La βs is better though π
"Dominion" has been turned into the word "Moist"
Is this antipoo from the carrots?
lol
Haha
> I was showing you antipoo π
πΌββοΈπ©... @Cali La La βs is better though π
@Beth Sorry, I was just super upset forgive me. π
No worries my friend ππΌ
Hahaha
I dont know what else to call a court case without merit, evidence, specific accusations or standing than baseless
@Dedkraken, you just advanced to level 28!
I believe Texas argument was misplaced. It was about the Electors Clause in the US Constitution and the "Plenary" Powers the US Constitution gives them. That Power is not subject to Review or Interpretation by the State Executive or Judicial Branches. It is only subject to Review by the US Supreme Court because it is a US Constitutional Question. State Law or Process of Laws has nothing to do with the Electors Clause.
π hiya love ππΌ
lol... I never get to flip folks off... π
Itβs great π
@Dedkraken It is not as if similar things have not been done before, in that case taking four months https://www.nytimes.com/1994/02/19/us/vote-fraud-ruling-shifts-pennsylvania-senate.html
Lmao love that one
Hahaha me too
Should have added Ricky Jay and Penn and Teller from the jump.
That's crazy.... no one is talking about this.... and it's even more crazy that this is on the New York Times site.. lol
Texas case was intended to set precedent for a ruling of no bueno on filings from Democrats in the future. Long game imo.
Again... they have done the footwork... if you mean Trump Legal Team. They have done everything possible so far as I can see...
But what we cannot do is get into a situation or set a precedent where anytime a candidate is a sore loser and wants to challenge the results we go through this type circus. Its dangerous to the democracy itself.
Trump team certainly didnt help themselves and their credibility by screaming fraud to every TV camera they could find and allege a giant conspiracy involving everyone from Republican Secs of States, Biden, the dog catcher and long dead dictators but then when they are in court they say "this is not a fraud case" and "we are not saying that anyone stole the election".
Its all for show. For Trump its a way to keep his base all fired up and donate their well over 200 Million so they can pay off his debt. And then of course with those legions of Cult of Trump members behind him he becomes a king maker in Republican politics for years to come
"Oh, so RNC you want me to endorse X... well it will cost ya. Oh, you won't pay my price...... one sec. Hey Donnie Jr, get ready to run for president."
@Cali La La exactly
Are there any cases from the past where people were charged with election fraud and ballots were not found on the bed or someone didn't rat someone else out?@Zuluzeit @Cali La La @SoonMrWick
Get a room
> Are there any cases from the past where people were charged with election fraud and ballots were not found on the bed or someone didn't rat someone else out?@Zuluzeit @Cali La La @SoonMrWick
@busillis Except for the ones where people just made an overwhelming gish gallop of claims in the hope that it would impress people, I'm not aware of any.
Well.... yeah I agree but the State do get to make up their own rules (to an extent) on how those electors are chosen... but its so minor as to be splitting hairs, so yes I agree with you on that
This is kind of what our legal system is built for, just saying. This is why I think it's a good thing that Rittenhouse is going through the motions and eventually to trial.