We do care about that... .why wouldn't anyone care about that?... that's kinda the whole point.

@JD~Jordan. It's their views on Original Jurisdiction.

Would you prefer they don't get smashed in court and then upset people find some other ridiculous way to handle it. Let the slow motion "you lost" movie play out. Because the alternative likely wouldn't have been pretty. If you've noticed as some people "feel" like they're being heard.... They're dropping off. I may have a different ***personal*** criteria than the court system does. I'm not going to pretend as though I didn't witness the biggest steal of an election ever.

But it's about what I feel, its what can be proven in court. Gut feelings don't really fly.

That's what Trumps legal team was stating. Sure Biden won by 100k votes in this state. Sure we can't prove 100k votes of wrongdoing. But if we prove a few hundred votes are off let's kick this bad boy to the state legislature so we cant just win by default. If that's your premise nobody is going to "get your answers". They even tried to steal electors without proving anything in court let alone a much smaller court outcome than would be required.

So much stuff is considered "evidence" in the technical sense. So yes, that whackado Melissa Corone's sworn affidavit is evidence. So are previous recordings... like the one that caught Rudy farting on that poor lady.

The issues is not "is there ANY evidence".... The issue is whether there is any reliable evidence that tends to prove the claim asserted.

I watched the entirety of Carone's testimony and its a freaking joke. What she was saying made zero sense... she attacked Republican members of those committees.... try to suggested that there was not a single register voter on the rolls. Suggested that a single ballot was counted 9 or 10 times. Claims that she saw stacks of 50 ballots being re-scanned over and over and when asked to put a number to it she said 30,000 ballots. None of that is even possible much less credible

Yeah exactly gut feelings didnt fly.

> @Zuluzeit I prefer the blind speculation approach....
@busillis I think you know you have my support there. Solid.

https://hereistheevidence.com

Even the url says so... so ... there *tongue out*

Is there an antipoo emoji? TIA

I think that was as to the case where States sue other States - which is certainly correct. The Supreme Court has Original Jurisdiction on those type matters. That is not to say they can't strike it down without having oral arguments if its a shit lawsuit... which it clearly was

🚽

Hahaha

I don't know if her statements have merit or not. I'm saying that I watched every single hearing that has taken place so far, and it seems like there is at least enough for someone to actually do the foot work to find out what the hell happened at these places and why. I don't think it's too much to ask for a forensic audit when the future of the USA is at stake... whatever that future my hold.

Needs to be golden. Tremendous option.

Don't poop emoji my posts. Wth is the matter with you?

Hi!🖕

You have to do this 🚫 💩

I dont think it is right to call them baseless, sure they are not specific enough to win in a court at the moment. But they do have some basis for their allegations. the GA one filed friday is certainly closer to having specific allocations which wan be proved either way

> You have to do this 🚫 💩
@Cali La La lol Thanks! I love you.

Seemed like a lot of stalling patch work while they get one they're really hoping will do the trick

I don't understand why these judges won't release the findings of this audit either... either way, the people should be able to know. If everything was legit... fine... but either way, we should be able to see that something was done, and these are the results.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/huge-attorney-matthew-deperno-confirms-dominion-voting-machines-michigan-county-changed-votes-trump-biden-not-human-error/

I was showing you antipoo 🙅🏼‍♀️💩... @Cali La La ‘s is better though 😂

@Maw lmfao

"Dominion" has been turned into the word "Moist"

Is this antipoo from the carrots?

lol

Haha

> I was showing you antipoo 🙅🏼‍♀️💩... @Cali La La ‘s is better though 😂
@Beth Sorry, I was just super upset forgive me. 🖕

No worries my friend 🖕🏼

Hahaha

I dont know what else to call a court case without merit, evidence, specific accusations or standing than baseless

@Dedkraken, you just advanced to level 28!

Venting and costly

@Zuluzeit @Beth 🖕

I believe Texas argument was misplaced. It was about the Electors Clause in the US Constitution and the "Plenary" Powers the US Constitution gives them. That Power is not subject to Review or Interpretation by the State Executive or Judicial Branches. It is only subject to Review by the US Supreme Court because it is a US Constitutional Question. State Law or Process of Laws has nothing to do with the Electors Clause.

😂 hiya love 🖕🏼

lol... I never get to flip folks off... 😂

It’s great 😂

@Dedkraken It is not as if similar things have not been done before, in that case taking four months https://www.nytimes.com/1994/02/19/us/vote-fraud-ruling-shifts-pennsylvania-senate.html