Message from @Philip R

Discord ID: 794409771272765460


2021-01-01 03:32:18 UTC  

I don't accept that either, but that is the current narrative.

2021-01-01 03:32:39 UTC  

Oh, sorry. Yes, we should have placed the continent elsewhere. But then the U.S. is just across the water, whereas we have a few other countries between us and China!

2021-01-01 03:34:30 UTC  

Biden supposedly won 477 of 3,113 counties. The Biden/Harris ticket supposedly managed to obtain 80,033,996 votes from 477 counties while the Clinton/Caine ticket received 65,844,610 from 487 counties. In 2008, Obama/Biden received 69,498,516 votes from 873 counties. So, Biden/Harris supposedly got 14,189,386 more votes than Clinton/Caine out of 10 less counties, while also getting 10,535,480 more votes than Obama/Biden out of 396 fewer counties.

2021-01-01 03:34:56 UTC  

Correct. Well done.

2021-01-01 03:35:23 UTC  

Bollocks.. I forgot about that 🙈

2021-01-01 03:35:25 UTC  

"outstanding"

2021-01-01 03:36:54 UTC  

I'll wait for this missive to drop.

2021-01-01 03:37:28 UTC  

Mao is back.

2021-01-01 03:38:01 UTC  

I agree on the placement of Australia in the wrong location. If you had any couth at all you should have put it someplace where it snows at Christmas and you don't spend the day surfing. 😉

2021-01-01 03:38:40 UTC  

And you may not be aware of this, but the biggest news media company in America is News Corp - they really are MSM, but for my purposes I call them part of the RWM. We have a very divisive (helped along by Trump) dichotomy of echo chambers MSM (as the right labels them) and the RWM. The information amplified in each chamber is very different. While the MSM may not have reported stories the way that the right wanted them reported, the RWM more than made up for it. The RWM wasn't exactly championing Biden and reporting favorable stories about him. So, the argument that the MSM is so unfair to the right is absolutely hollow.

The "censorship" on Social Media did more to bring light to the stories that they were supposedly trying to suppress. It had no effect except to give the right even more grievances to whine about, but the information received way more attention than it would have otherwise.

2021-01-01 03:38:53 UTC  

Something else that wouldn't happen in Oz (although you could argue that this is the wrong way to go), as we have compulsory voting. So the number of votes will always be close to the number of registered voters.

2021-01-01 03:39:26 UTC  

Ah yes, but then the world would be even more top heavy, and that would be quite destabilising!

2021-01-01 03:39:42 UTC  

top heavy?

2021-01-01 03:39:48 UTC  

oh....you think it is round?

2021-01-01 03:39:53 UTC  

I actually think compulsory voting would mean a one party system for the US.

2021-01-01 03:39:57 UTC  

guys, we have a globist here!

2021-01-01 03:40:14 UTC  

😆 yes!

2021-01-01 03:40:17 UTC  

'Patriots' would lose their minds with compulsory voting.

2021-01-01 03:40:29 UTC  

Simply not true... Trump arguably interfered more by claiming for 7 months ahead of the election that it was rigged. Imagine that. The most powerful man on the planet knew that fraud would happen and he was powerless to stop it.

2021-01-01 03:40:48 UTC  

Well, we also have preferential voting, which kind of prevents that.

2021-01-01 03:40:59 UTC  

Americans are not mature enough for compulsory voting. If we were forced to vote we would have 150 million votes for cartoon characters out of spite. But when you have 170,000 votes in one precinct cast by non-existent voters I suppose such write in votes would not bother the Democratic Party.

2021-01-01 03:41:14 UTC  

what about this? Everyone gets to vote 100 times. That way, everyone can vote until the lactic acid sets in.

2021-01-01 03:41:58 UTC  

Vote early and vote often.

2021-01-01 03:42:22 UTC  

the earlier you get there, the more you get to vote.

2021-01-01 03:42:43 UTC  

Patriots wouldn't. But Joe-Blow-Grab-A-Six-Pack would. And then there is the problem of all the people we won't let vote.

2021-01-01 03:42:55 UTC  

Fox is not right-wing. That's a leftist mischaracterisation. A survey of the media done after Trump's first 100 days shows that the rest of the mainstream media was anti-Trump, whereas Fox was 50/50.

The "censorship" on social media was not scare-quotes censorship, but actual, effective, censorship.

2021-01-01 03:43:06 UTC  

????

2021-01-01 03:43:26 UTC  

Certainly, vote often means 2 to 5 times per election right?

2021-01-01 03:43:48 UTC  

He may be the most powerful, but his power is limited to certain areas. So no, that does not make the case.

2021-01-01 03:44:14 UTC  

It's almost as right as it gets.

2021-01-01 03:44:25 UTC  

If fox news is right wing, what do we call Oswald Mosley?

2021-01-01 03:44:48 UTC  

north wing?

2021-01-01 03:45:03 UTC  

@Philip R Nah. It wasn't effective. The 'censorship' backfired because for people with that mentality, being 'censored' is considered proof that they're onto something.

2021-01-01 03:45:20 UTC  

He did not make a false claim. The Democratic PArty was rigging the election right in front of people and the MSM was encouraging it.

2021-01-01 03:45:35 UTC  

Also... lost in all of this is the concerted effort on the right to suppress the vote. The efforts by Democrats before the election to make it easier to vote has received more attention post election, but Republicans were equally intent on making it harder. Consider that TX and FL both cast about 11M ballots - TX has 7.5M more residents than FL. Does that mean that Floridians are more patriotic than Texans? I think not. Texas did everything they could to make it harder for people to vote in urban areas that are heavily Democratic.

2021-01-01 03:45:45 UTC  

like the guy being dragged off the plane shouting: "But I am the true king!" Clearly the cops are hiding something. @Zuluzeit

2021-01-01 03:45:56 UTC  

Is legally taking appropriate avenues to change election laws actually rigging though?