Message from @Ghostdog
Discord ID: 794554204411789332
You did not present a point. You promulgated a mischaracterization.
For sure.
Think I'm going to head off to bed too. Goodnight everyone, and happy new years!
Behave, etc.
That is because Hawley not only represents his state, he is also not a collaborating corporatist selling his nation out to its enemies for cash.
Welcome back the Obiden administration.
"Intercourse with someone that is not mature enough physically and emotionally to process the experience as an adult, that is without harm, is wrong."
So my point stands. You seem to be splitting hairs between intercourse and marriage. Marriage includes intercourse. A marriage with someone too young is therefore wrong, and it is proper for governments to regulate that.
You’re enjoying yourself, trolling in Mao. I get it. For you it was 4 years of Hitler. But you’re focused on the wrong target.
Imagine you lived through the cultural revolution. Or Nazi germany. Or the colonization or the America’s. Or any suffering.
It’s funny to put up Mao, until you’ve known the horror of Mao personally.
For the record, all my edits are spacing 😂
It’s like the Trump team set out to manufacture an exact replica of what happened in 1877 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1876_United_States_presidential_election#Electoral_disputes_and_the_Compromise_of_1877
How history repeats itself...
Happy new years.
Night.
Happy New Year All....May 2021 be a great year for us all...
Trumps Department of Justice told Gohmert to go screw himself and his interpretation of the Vice Presidents powers in the Constitution 😄
@Gypsy There are lots of leaders which people don't like and/or find egregiously offensive for any number of reasons, huh? Some might be actively inflicting themselves upon the world at this very moment. Some can do no more harm. Hopefully no one will melt. I'll take my chances. Murica.
bit last minute to argue the constitutionality of the act
@Dedkraken Who exactly is the respondent there? I just want to update my list of apostates.
The department of justice sent that in the lawsuit
Yikes. More treason.
treason?
umm @Maw are you asking as if a Minor or as if they have HIV? as IMO that is the only 2 reasons that would happen in the real. there is a huge "Grey" area with intoxication and intended consent kinda as in "Would You Like A Pudding POP"?
I'm not following!
just read above @GregInHouston2 answering an old question in all actual kinda harshly for @Maw but it is an honest answer
No doubt about that! I have been trying to catch up as more posts are added. It appears to be the thread I created in the "maxwell" case.
> treason?
@Ghostdog Yes, like the newly exposed CCP operatives such as Bill Barr, Mitch McConnell, the CISA guy, Brian Kemp, et al. I'm starting to catch on to the trend and it's terrifying.
as in if you are able to give consent in the 1st place then you get fucked up "intoxicated" or otherwise then you better be with people you trust or at least if you are into that have a safe word...
ahh ok i get where ur coming from now
My question is "Why is it okay for a girl to consent to sex with every boy in her class but if she chooses sex with an adult then he goes to prison?" I kind of get treated like I want to do such a thing!
No one thinks you want to do something like that. Honest philosophical inquiry, I reckon.
Exactly!
At least I hope so. Lol. I gotchu.
i understand Whores as myself you pay for it one way or another. There needs to be an age of the ability to give consent. Are you trying to tell me that 8 yr old was asking for it @GregInHouston2 you have to know right from wrong and how are you able to make it into law?
I don’t understand why Robert in videos is saying removing 230 gives the public more trust in the mainstream news very strange