No, I'm not the one thinking Children are Adults, you are correct there.

You have very vehemently argued for segregating persons whom you do not like into special categories for unequal treatment under the law. You specifically hold that the law is to be ignored concerning people you want excluded from it and to be used as an iron maiden on those whom you hate.

So in this case do I hate children?

'Pivotflecting' is my new word.

You did not read what I wrote. If you had you would have noted the differentiation I made concerning minors. That they should be chaperoned until they reach the age of majority. That interpersonal relationships, even where there is no physical contact allowed, should be within a limited age range. And no, I am suggesting you hate any person with authority and therefore act and choose positions from this position of prejudice.

Welcome to the segregation party then?

Your words.

Nope. Misconstrued and likely deliberately misunderstood.

Not unless you misconstrued my point.

Well, happy new year. Sleep will be a relief.

You did not present a point. You promulgated a mischaracterization.

For sure.

Think I'm going to head off to bed too. Goodnight everyone, and happy new years!

Behave, etc.

https://tenor.com/view/happy-new-year-gif-19172920

https://parler.com/post/9664df96b062417c9aa91bd5f67fa754

That is because Hawley not only represents his state, he is also not a collaborating corporatist selling his nation out to its enemies for cash.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/us-taxpayer-money-went-to-al-qaeda-affiliate-during-obama-administration-senate-reports_3638353.html

Welcome back the Obiden administration.

"Intercourse with someone that is not mature enough physically and emotionally to process the experience as an adult, that is without harm, is wrong."
So my point stands. You seem to be splitting hairs between intercourse and marriage. Marriage includes intercourse. A marriage with someone too young is therefore wrong, and it is proper for governments to regulate that.

You’re enjoying yourself, trolling in Mao. I get it. For you it was 4 years of Hitler. But you’re focused on the wrong target.


Imagine you lived through the cultural revolution. Or Nazi germany. Or the colonization or the America’s. Or any suffering.



It’s funny to put up Mao, until you’ve known the horror of Mao personally.


For the record, all my edits are spacing 😂

It’s like the Trump team set out to manufacture an exact replica of what happened in 1877 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1876_United_States_presidential_election#Electoral_disputes_and_the_Compromise_of_1877

How history repeats itself...

Happy new years.

Night.

Happy New Year All....May 2021 be a great year for us all...

I take that back. Ill end it on Julian Assange 6 years ago

Trumps Department of Justice told Gohmert to go screw himself and his interpretation of the Vice Presidents powers in the Constitution 😄

the congress has the powers there

@Gypsy There are lots of leaders which people don't like and/or find egregiously offensive for any number of reasons, huh? Some might be actively inflicting themselves upon the world at this very moment. Some can do no more harm. Hopefully no one will melt. I'll take my chances. Murica.

bit last minute to argue the constitutionality of the act

@Dedkraken Who exactly is the respondent there? I just want to update my list of apostates.

The department of justice sent that in the lawsuit

Yikes. More treason.

treason?

umm @Maw are you asking as if a Minor or as if they have HIV? as IMO that is the only 2 reasons that would happen in the real. there is a huge "Grey" area with intoxication and intended consent kinda as in "Would You Like A Pudding POP"?

@Whithers @Maw How did this thread get started in this section? It seems out of place for election2020. It is an interesting question!

I'm not following!

just read above @GregInHouston2 answering an old question in all actual kinda harshly for @Maw but it is an honest answer