Message from @Psyclone
Discord ID: 616637345734852629
Oh?
I'm a troll?
Alright.
Pure coca cola ideology.
AI is limited, computing processing power is powerful, but the problem is that fuzzy logic emulates logical thinking but doesn't actually do logical thinking
Exactly. You need to be open to the possibility that you are wrong. And so far you’re not. Theories are nice. But we’ve examined the so-called ‘evidence’ that supports these theories, and they’re not *real* evidence. They’re further speculation and theory, backed up by theoretical maths. Give us some evidence IN REALITY that proves your model.
That’s the point.
C++ is object oriented programming and is also aplication programming, not that complicated.
system programming is harder to code, program the language above application programming
sure, i'm opened to being wrong, however, your proofs are wrong and don't work with the real world, take one look at a flat map and realize how distances are distorted
coding more to machine language
No one claims a 100% accurate map. And I certainly didn’t. So that’s a straw man.
Can you provide a verifiable measurement of curvature of the ground?
are you saying that it's harder to code using machine code than C++ for example
@Lampz I said that the images of the sun and Moon are sometimes distorted by the Earth's atmosphere, which can give the impression that both objects are in the sky when in reality they aren't. This isn't personification, thus is how atmospheric distortion works. Nor was I saying that the sun and Moon are just projections. Good lord.
a flat map is horribly distorted, there's a reason why you need many smaller localized maps.
because the second you try to represent something bigger, it starts being extremely imprecise, you can have a way more accurate map using a globe.
it's not a strawman, flat maps are monstrously distorted
Why does the US geological survey use the AE map then?
They don’t use Mercator.
Who’s arguing maps?
That doesn’t prove anything at all.
@Logrian 💯
Talk about reality please.
Not maps. Not theories.
Demonstrate something IN REALITY.
@Ymir just... terrifying explain your sabs
Hm?
because in the US, AE is more accurate than mercator, but i can guaranty you that australia doesn't use the same map
yes, a map is a representation of reality
@Logrian Huh?
@Deleted User You can learn a lot from older people.
Yes
@Ymir just... terrifying What coca cola mentality
I'm not allowed to say.
Or Coca Cola will sacrifice me to the devil.
😱
@Psyclone if you don't believe maps represent reality (to a degree), you're either denying them because they don't fit your narrative or don't understand what they are
A depiction of the earth on paper is by no means necessarily a depiction of reality. No one claims a 100% accurate map. Not globe. Not flat. Where are you getting this from??
Ahhh
‘To a degree’