@Logrian He was just arguing every point to argue.

@carlito was it coded in C++?

how much power does it consume?

@Akhanyatin such a troll

why? why are you saying that I am a troll?

well, since cloud computing is now online, i guess it pulls resources from every device connected to the internet, including phones, tablets laptops, etc, , processing power is shared among-st billions of embedded processors

You give yourself away @Akhanyatin “scientific papers supporting THEORIES’....

We like to deal with reality.

But nice attempt at a dig.

lol C++

what are you laughing about C++?

@carlito you do realize that you can monitor the trafic going in and out of your machine right?
@Psyclone yes, theories that represent reality. the reason they are called theories is not because they are made up but because in science, you need to be open minded and be opened to the fact that you can be wrong.

@carlito what's wrong with C++??

nothing is wrong with C++ , i would think AI is bit beyond that by now that's all

what do you mean *beyond* that? do you know what C++ is?

im back

it's a programming language

Oh?

I'm a troll?

Alright.

Pure coca cola ideology.

AI is limited, computing processing power is powerful, but the problem is that fuzzy logic emulates logical thinking but doesn't actually do logical thinking

Exactly. You need to be open to the possibility that you are wrong. And so far you’re not. Theories are nice. But we’ve examined the so-called ‘evidence’ that supports these theories, and they’re not *real* evidence. They’re further speculation and theory, backed up by theoretical maths. Give us some evidence IN REALITY that proves your model.

That’s the point.

C++ is object oriented programming and is also aplication programming, not that complicated.

system programming is harder to code, program the language above application programming

sure, i'm opened to being wrong, however, your proofs are wrong and don't work with the real world, take one look at a flat map and realize how distances are distorted

coding more to machine language

No one claims a 100% accurate map. And I certainly didn’t. So that’s a straw man.

Can you provide a verifiable measurement of curvature of the ground?

are you saying that it's harder to code using machine code than C++ for example

@Lampz I said that the images of the sun and Moon are sometimes distorted by the Earth's atmosphere, which can give the impression that both objects are in the sky when in reality they aren't. This isn't personification, thus is how atmospheric distortion works. Nor was I saying that the sun and Moon are just projections. Good lord.

a flat map is horribly distorted, there's a reason why you need many smaller localized maps.
because the second you try to represent something bigger, it starts being extremely imprecise, you can have a way more accurate map using a globe.

it's not a strawman, flat maps are monstrously distorted

Why does the US geological survey use the AE map then?

They don’t use Mercator.

Who’s arguing maps?

The globe doesn’t have an accurate map. All the land masses are distorted.

That doesn’t prove anything at all.