Message from @Seeker of Truth
Discord ID: 626713453809238026
>>> The shape of a sideways figure eight has a long pedigree; for instance, it appears in the cross of Saint Boniface, wrapped around the bars of a Latin cross.[1] However, John Wallis is credited with introducing the infinity symbol with its mathematical meaning in 1655, in his De sectionibus conicis.[1][2][3][4] Wallis did not explain his choice of this symbol, but it has been conjectured to be a variant form of a Roman numeral for 1,000 (originally CIƆ, also CƆ), which was sometimes used to mean "many", or of the Greek letter ω (omega), the last letter in the Greek alphabet.[5]
taken from the etymology of the word symbol
It's pretty interesting
Hoewever symbolism isn't really proof tbh
hi
did i call it proof?
Just because emojiis are yellow it doesn't mean that the perfect human being is yellow
i said the orobus you mention is a symbol, and showed the etymology of the word
neither is NASA's Hollywood style trickery and paintings
Alright ok I am an outsider I don't know which one is true
yes, well there's tonnes of proof of fakery
However your theory just does not really sound solid
Test the globe.
See what issues you come up with.
Just because one theory is wrong doesn't mean this theory is right?
well, at least you are at a good starting point
I mean idk about the whole globe theory, but this theory does not sound solid
realising that the one theory is wrong
Idk if the other theory is wrong
They both may be right in different ways.
It sounds more solid though, considering it can actually predict stuff
im referring to the spinning globe heliocentric theory.. surely you'd agree that's wrong! @Seeker of Truth
Like I said it explains a lot of stuff, besides you can predict things with it
And the last part is not possible for your theory
Heliocentric is wrong yes
but perhaps The World could be looked at in a certain way so that it can be represented as being a globe
(the shape of the world energy grid / lines)
magnetically
yes that's what i meant
electrically
the aether
versus the physical / optical shape
which is flat overall
But why do you guys think the heliocentric model is wrong?
I mean I haven't really looked into it so what are your theories?
or are things that we don't understand actually preventing us from seeing that it is actually concave? ^^;
possibly, , but if the evidence leads towards concave then so be it
"Answer: Yes, the Sun - in fact, our whole solar system - orbits around the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. We are moving at an average velocity of 828,000 km/hr. But even at that high rate, it still takes us about 230 million years to make one complete orbit around the Milky Way!" how could the stars remain the same if this were true?
Well we're going kinda slow on the scale of the whole universe....
well, if they all move around the centre of the galaxy at the same rate?
youre both going hypothetical now
I don't think NASA presents us with the truth, I think the world / "universe" is a lot smaller