Message from @carlito
Discord ID: 626714379395792908
well, at least you are at a good starting point
I mean idk about the whole globe theory, but this theory does not sound solid
realising that the one theory is wrong
Idk if the other theory is wrong
They both may be right in different ways.
depending on how you look at them
It sounds more solid though, considering it can actually predict stuff
im referring to the spinning globe heliocentric theory.. surely you'd agree that's wrong! @Seeker of Truth
Like I said it explains a lot of stuff, besides you can predict things with it
And the last part is not possible for your theory
Heliocentric is wrong yes
but perhaps The World could be looked at in a certain way so that it can be represented as being a globe
(the shape of the world energy grid / lines)
magnetically
yes that's what i meant
electrically
the aether
versus the physical / optical shape
which is flat overall
But why do you guys think the heliocentric model is wrong?
I mean I haven't really looked into it so what are your theories?
or are things that we don't understand actually preventing us from seeing that it is actually concave? ^^;
"Answer: Yes, the Sun - in fact, our whole solar system - orbits around the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. We are moving at an average velocity of 828,000 km/hr. But even at that high rate, it still takes us about 230 million years to make one complete orbit around the Milky Way!" how could the stars remain the same if this were true?
Well we're going kinda slow on the scale of the whole universe....
well, if they all move around the centre of the galaxy at the same rate?
youre both going hypothetical now
I don't think NASA presents us with the truth, I think the world / "universe" is a lot smaller
But why would they not?
or, again, maybe we are the universe
because people lie to other people to have control over them
how does a distant planet such as uranus reflect enough light from the same even more distant sun back to earth for it to be visible to us with the naked eye? hhm
@Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids Well no youre looking for a flaw in the existing theory, the existing theory says the stars are really far away so how am I going hypothetical and you're not?
it was obvious how you went hypothetical
By saying the stars are far away?
Okay, to what purpose?
dont try to troll me
I'm not trolling, I'm interested
intrigued
'uranus' you have to love it omw someone is laughing right now