yes, well there's tonnes of proof of fakery

However your theory just does not really sound solid

Test the globe.

See what issues you come up with.

Just because one theory is wrong doesn't mean this theory is right?

well, at least you are at a good starting point

I mean idk about the whole globe theory, but this theory does not sound solid

realising that the one theory is wrong

Idk if the other theory is wrong

They both may be right in different ways.

depending on how you look at them

It sounds more solid though, considering it can actually predict stuff

im referring to the spinning globe heliocentric theory.. surely you'd agree that's wrong! @Seeker of Truth

Like I said it explains a lot of stuff, besides you can predict things with it

And the last part is not possible for your theory

Heliocentric is wrong yes
but perhaps The World could be looked at in a certain way so that it can be represented as being a globe
(the shape of the world energy grid / lines)

magnetically

yes that's what i meant

electrically

the aether

versus the physical / optical shape

which is flat overall

But why do you guys think the heliocentric model is wrong?

I mean I haven't really looked into it so what are your theories?

or are things that we don't understand actually preventing us from seeing that it is actually concave? ^^;

possibly, , but if the evidence leads towards concave then so be it

"Answer: Yes, the Sun - in fact, our whole solar system - orbits around the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. We are moving at an average velocity of 828,000 km/hr. But even at that high rate, it still takes us about 230 million years to make one complete orbit around the Milky Way!" how could the stars remain the same if this were true?

Well we're going kinda slow on the scale of the whole universe....

well, if they all move around the centre of the galaxy at the same rate?

youre both going hypothetical now

I don't think NASA presents us with the truth, I think the world / "universe" is a lot smaller

But why would they not?

or, again, maybe we are the universe

because people lie to other people to have control over them

how does a distant planet such as uranus reflect enough light from the same even more distant sun back to earth for it to be visible to us with the naked eye? hhm

@Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids Well no youre looking for a flaw in the existing theory, the existing theory says the stars are really far away so how am I going hypothetical and you're not?

it was obvious how you went hypothetical

By saying the stars are far away?

Okay, to what purpose?