Message from @Jondar02

Discord ID: 626712757848375296


2019-09-26 09:26:42 UTC  

How do you know it's from there?

2019-09-26 09:26:49 UTC  

And not from the snake biting itself

2019-09-26 09:27:24 UTC  

There is always more to the story.

2019-09-26 09:28:07 UTC  

Different symbols can be used to multiple things or the same thing.

2019-09-26 09:28:29 UTC  

All depends on perspective.

2019-09-26 09:28:48 UTC  

Though symbolism isn't really scientific proof if you get what I mean

2019-09-26 09:29:29 UTC  

Perhaps that is a good thing, given how many lies mainstream scientism religion presents to us daily.

2019-09-26 09:29:36 UTC  

orobus symbol (n.)
early 15c., "creed, summary, religious belief," from Late Latin symbolum "creed, token, mark," from Greek symbolon "token, watchword, sign by which one infers; ticket, a permit, licence" (the word was applied c.250 by Cyprian of Carthage to the Apostles' Creed, on the notion of the "mark" that distinguishes Christians from pagans), literally "that which is thrown or cast together," from assimilated form of syn- "together" (see syn-) + bole "a throwing, a casting, the stroke of a missile, bolt, beam," from bol-, nominative stem of ballein "to throw" (from PIE root *gwele- "to throw, reach").

The sense evolution in Greek is from "throwing things together" to "contrasting" to "comparing" to "token used in comparisons to determine if something is genuine." Hence, "outward sign" of something. The meaning "something which stands for something else" first recorded 1590 (in "Faerie Queene"). As a written character, 1610s.

2019-09-26 09:30:25 UTC  

Hello people

2019-09-26 09:30:28 UTC  

hi

2019-09-26 09:30:31 UTC  

Hi

2019-09-26 09:30:34 UTC  

hi!

2019-09-26 09:30:57 UTC  

the serpent youre mentioning is the orobus

2019-09-26 09:31:01 UTC  

Yea

2019-09-26 09:31:12 UTC  

Though I just googled it and apparently it's a deviation from the green omega

2019-09-26 09:31:34 UTC  

The meaning "something which stands for something else"

2019-09-26 09:31:54 UTC  

>>> The shape of a sideways figure eight has a long pedigree; for instance, it appears in the cross of Saint Boniface, wrapped around the bars of a Latin cross.[1] However, John Wallis is credited with introducing the infinity symbol with its mathematical meaning in 1655, in his De sectionibus conicis.[1][2][3][4] Wallis did not explain his choice of this symbol, but it has been conjectured to be a variant form of a Roman numeral for 1,000 (originally CIƆ, also CƆ), which was sometimes used to mean "many", or of the Greek letter ω (omega), the last letter in the Greek alphabet.[5]

2019-09-26 09:31:57 UTC  

taken from the etymology of the word symbol

2019-09-26 09:32:21 UTC  

It's pretty interesting

2019-09-26 09:32:29 UTC  

Hoewever symbolism isn't really proof tbh

2019-09-26 09:32:45 UTC  

hi

2019-09-26 09:32:45 UTC  

did i call it proof?

2019-09-26 09:33:01 UTC  

Just because emojiis are yellow it doesn't mean that the perfect human being is yellow

2019-09-26 09:33:11 UTC  

i said the orobus you mention is a symbol, and showed the etymology of the word

2019-09-26 09:33:14 UTC  

neither is NASA's Hollywood style trickery and paintings

2019-09-26 09:33:38 UTC  

Alright ok I am an outsider I don't know which one is true

2019-09-26 09:33:44 UTC  

yes, well there's tonnes of proof of fakery

2019-09-26 09:33:55 UTC  

However your theory just does not really sound solid

2019-09-26 09:34:15 UTC  

Test the globe.

2019-09-26 09:34:28 UTC  

See what issues you come up with.

2019-09-26 09:34:37 UTC  

Just because one theory is wrong doesn't mean this theory is right?

2019-09-26 09:34:59 UTC  

well, at least you are at a good starting point

2019-09-26 09:35:01 UTC  

I mean idk about the whole globe theory, but this theory does not sound solid

2019-09-26 09:35:05 UTC  

realising that the one theory is wrong

2019-09-26 09:35:13 UTC  

Idk if the other theory is wrong

2019-09-26 09:35:17 UTC  

They both may be right in different ways.

2019-09-26 09:35:31 UTC  

depending on how you look at them

2019-09-26 09:35:35 UTC  

It sounds more solid though, considering it can actually predict stuff

2019-09-26 09:36:03 UTC  

im referring to the spinning globe heliocentric theory.. surely you'd agree that's wrong! @Seeker of Truth

2019-09-26 09:36:28 UTC  

Like I said it explains a lot of stuff, besides you can predict things with it

2019-09-26 09:36:36 UTC  

And the last part is not possible for your theory