Message from @Seeker of Truth

Discord ID: 626713189635063808


2019-09-26 09:30:28 UTC  

hi

2019-09-26 09:30:31 UTC  

Hi

2019-09-26 09:30:34 UTC  

hi!

2019-09-26 09:30:57 UTC  

the serpent youre mentioning is the orobus

2019-09-26 09:31:01 UTC  

Yea

2019-09-26 09:31:12 UTC  

Though I just googled it and apparently it's a deviation from the green omega

2019-09-26 09:31:34 UTC  

The meaning "something which stands for something else"

2019-09-26 09:31:54 UTC  

>>> The shape of a sideways figure eight has a long pedigree; for instance, it appears in the cross of Saint Boniface, wrapped around the bars of a Latin cross.[1] However, John Wallis is credited with introducing the infinity symbol with its mathematical meaning in 1655, in his De sectionibus conicis.[1][2][3][4] Wallis did not explain his choice of this symbol, but it has been conjectured to be a variant form of a Roman numeral for 1,000 (originally CIƆ, also CƆ), which was sometimes used to mean "many", or of the Greek letter ω (omega), the last letter in the Greek alphabet.[5]

2019-09-26 09:31:57 UTC  

taken from the etymology of the word symbol

2019-09-26 09:32:21 UTC  

It's pretty interesting

2019-09-26 09:32:29 UTC  

Hoewever symbolism isn't really proof tbh

2019-09-26 09:32:45 UTC  

hi

2019-09-26 09:32:45 UTC  

did i call it proof?

2019-09-26 09:33:01 UTC  

Just because emojiis are yellow it doesn't mean that the perfect human being is yellow

2019-09-26 09:33:11 UTC  

i said the orobus you mention is a symbol, and showed the etymology of the word

2019-09-26 09:33:14 UTC  

neither is NASA's Hollywood style trickery and paintings

2019-09-26 09:33:38 UTC  

Alright ok I am an outsider I don't know which one is true

2019-09-26 09:33:44 UTC  

yes, well there's tonnes of proof of fakery

2019-09-26 09:33:55 UTC  

However your theory just does not really sound solid

2019-09-26 09:34:15 UTC  

Test the globe.

2019-09-26 09:34:28 UTC  

See what issues you come up with.

2019-09-26 09:34:37 UTC  

Just because one theory is wrong doesn't mean this theory is right?

2019-09-26 09:34:59 UTC  

well, at least you are at a good starting point

2019-09-26 09:35:01 UTC  

I mean idk about the whole globe theory, but this theory does not sound solid

2019-09-26 09:35:05 UTC  

realising that the one theory is wrong

2019-09-26 09:35:13 UTC  

Idk if the other theory is wrong

2019-09-26 09:35:17 UTC  

They both may be right in different ways.

2019-09-26 09:35:31 UTC  

depending on how you look at them

2019-09-26 09:35:35 UTC  

It sounds more solid though, considering it can actually predict stuff

2019-09-26 09:36:03 UTC  

im referring to the spinning globe heliocentric theory.. surely you'd agree that's wrong! @Seeker of Truth

2019-09-26 09:36:28 UTC  

Like I said it explains a lot of stuff, besides you can predict things with it

2019-09-26 09:36:36 UTC  

And the last part is not possible for your theory

2019-09-26 09:37:09 UTC  

Heliocentric is wrong yes
but perhaps The World could be looked at in a certain way so that it can be represented as being a globe
(the shape of the world energy grid / lines)

2019-09-26 09:37:22 UTC  

magnetically

2019-09-26 09:37:23 UTC  

yes that's what i meant

2019-09-26 09:37:26 UTC  

electrically

2019-09-26 09:37:29 UTC  

the aether

2019-09-26 09:37:46 UTC  

versus the physical / optical shape

2019-09-26 09:37:53 UTC  

which is flat overall

2019-09-26 09:38:19 UTC  

But why do you guys think the heliocentric model is wrong?

2019-09-26 09:38:31 UTC  

I mean I haven't really looked into it so what are your theories?