Message from @StoneCold316
Discord ID: 758496231373930497
I tested negative for covid today đ not that anyone should care. Haha
I had it never felt sick
Having a strong immune system helps you a lot. Lowering your sugar intake + Vitamine D + Zinc + Vitamine C + Resveratrol greatly improves your Immunity (7-12 times over the average in response to combatting previously unknown pathogens)
Wars are always easier to start than they are to stop. If a vaccine is not developed, we will be wearing masks for the next 5 years.
@Yussuki âȘ what about drinking bleach ? đ
Stop wearing the mask. Record people saying they lie about their travels. Expose the sham that this is
Anyone who still believes the hoax that Trump said anyone should inject or ingest bleach is either lazy or ideologically possessed
Drinking bleach is stupid. Virus cant survive in the gut anyway :)) But many ppl do it , Stone.
Your views on the Woodward tapes @JPMcGlone
Preface: Iâm from NY and understand Trumpâs choices in language differently than many of my peers.
I think Trump understands he cannot predict the future. He followed the advice of âthe expertsâ and lead from a position that was meant to limit panic.
He definitely downplayed the potential worst case scenario. He also up played the potential best case scenario.
I believe in a democratic REPUBLIC and know that trump isnât responsible for me. Heâs one of the last people in this country who is responsible for me, so his opinions or advice donât really make a difference to me.
I remember when he was shutting down flights from China and NY Democrats were saying âgo to the Chinese fair! Donât pay attention to your racist presidentâ
I agreed. If you wanted to go to the fair, go. If you didnât, donât.
Boy how the Democrats flipped from individual liberty to âTrump is in charge of us allâ so quickly đ
What do you think the head of the state is responsible for? If not for the people?
And also - you donât see anything wrong with lying? Or misrepresentation at the lowest?
Preface: I donât have skin in this game; asking questions only.
Least* not lowest
To protect the nation by protecting the land and setting the general framework for prosperity to happen.
What constitutes a nation? Protecting the land for whom? Prosperity of whom?
đ
I'm so sorry that I missed this conversation.
Itâs never too late
Hereâs a covid story. We have a study hall period at my school. I asked my supervisor, who is the schoolâs biology teacher, if a friend and I could work together at a large table opposite each other. She put her hand on her head in frustration, âIâve been having to shut off my scientific brain and turn on my robot brain,â she said, âthe administration says no, and you have to sit outside if you want, but you have to sit next to each other and not facing.â I responded, âall of the masks and the distancing and the one way hallways are religious ritual to an invisible god, isnât it.â âIt sure is,â she said.
I would be bad if I'd say: "Yes, masks reduce the likelihood" because we have no study. I would also be bad if I'd say: "No, masks don't reduce the likelihood" because still we have no study. I don't know if we can have a comprehensive study to ask this question and on which we could all agree. I think most people go by the logic that: "Having a mask is better than no mask in fighting the virus." - Argument being that: "Having something is better than nothing." I can also understand that logic. But can other people also understand that there might be diminishing returns in the Grand Scheme of Things on obliging people to wear masks ? It seems to be a trade-off. Is it worth it? I'd pose the following question: "Let's assume wearing masks is a tradeoff. Let's assume also that wearing masks is a a negative trade-off on the long run and we are all aware of it. Than: How can we diminish the negative trade-offs in the future and still be wearing masks?" **** ======= ****So from what she was saying, you and your friend can stay "back to back" or "side to side" or "ear to ear in a straight line" đ @ Zurich That's a good one :)))
Hmm - this is quite painful. Masks donât reduce likelihood of virus transfer. I guess nothing is self- evident.
When have masks not helped with airborne pathogens? Yes itâs too soon for data on Corona specifically. We do have data on airborne pathogens. Itâs why we cover ourselves when we sneeze. I believe that this is a case where we can be safe to assume that many of the rules apply.
Exactly.
All I wonder is how many of the precautions are more for psychological effect, especially considering that most people donât follow them strictly and the enforcement isnât 100%
Zino
Wearing a mask stops tiny droplets. Tiny droplets can contain covid19. Wearing a mask. stops covid19.
Is there a problem with that?
Compelled Germophobia is a terrible idea. We understand the risks and wish that those most scared of it would choose to stay home and network as they see fit. The rest of us will work and network as we see fit.
The costs of the rules we *must follow* during COVID are incalculable.
People who say no to the lockdowns and masks have access to the same information you do. You can assume youâre just smarter than they are, or you can realize that they prioritize things differently; and they have that right.
Chicken Little was afraid the sky was falling, and was easy to manipulate by the Fox. I am neither chicken little nor the Fox, and youâll need to literally kill me because I wonât play that game
Compelled germophobia?? Iâd hope that everyone would be precautious at a possibly life threatening virus that can put others at extreme risk
The cost to your liberty be stupid vs the cost to healthcare and to people for healthcare and you putting others at risk. I choose your liberty.
Well I guess as long as youâre not affected why should we care about those who it does affect
In other words, I no longer care if masks reduce the likelihood of Covid spread. The credibility of the information and conclusions on this is low.
If you truly believe that people must stay inside and wear masks. Stick to your conviction and imprison or kill them if they say no.
That doesnât seem worth it, does it? Guess you have to actually cooperate instead of impose force the.
I care greatly. Itâs you who doesnât care if you believe your fear justifies your total control of a population/
So, kill me. And everyone else who tells you and your politicians no. If you arenât willing to do that, I believe arguing about it is a waste of time. Keep sharing information and make decisions you think are best to make
The credibility of this information is low? Ask your doctor not to wear a mask when performing surgery next time. Please. You want to protect ur liberty ? Have it. But if it puts others at actual greater risk itâs not a case of individual right anymore.
âI choose your libertyâ precisely. And if you try to take it, one of us will die. Good luck
I choose to protect your liberty. You choose to spend mine
No youâre taking it down to the level of locking yourself inside and imprisoning yourself all that was said was to wear a mask. And the evidence that a mask reduces the likelihood of a respiratory virus is clear.
So to the conclusions of a cost benefit analysis u say â I kill youâ .
My liberty isnât yours to spend