Message from @edickens
Discord ID: 522155623387758602
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i need a context.
16.
<:Sheeeeeeeit:476034406423855105>
And only to the extent of how servere the crime is.
Interesting question. If the crime necessitates someone being taken into custody, obviously it would be the person who committed the crime. If it's a crime that causes financial harm then obviously the parent would pay, unless their child is working.
13
Generally though, I dislike punishing people by putting them in cages and would rather them pay for most crimes via fines to the victims.
That's a Strasserist idea, btw.
21 definetly
Worth noting, holding parents accountable for non-working children financially would also encourage parents to get their kids working or out of the house, another benefit.
What I don't like is the state choosing to try people as adults arbitrarily. Age to drive 14-17, 18 to smoke,16-18 to have sex, 21 to drink, 17to join the military, 13 to be tried as an adult. Doesn't make sense IMHO.
when one hits puberty
18
or 16
15
@everyone Daily Question đź”–
-Do you take Democratic Socialism as a serious thing, why or why not?
No
no
No
because it's socialism
no
No
no.
It's retarded
No fuck you faggot
Fucking reee
*lmao* no
It's socialism
I don’t either. Its mixing democracy with socialism.
It’s retarded
>democracy
kek
socialism doesn't work with democracy
Both are failed systems
I support National Socialism faggot
retarded question
It’s either democracy or socialism
tyranny by the majority
@Pinochet Except that it's often non-democratic
socialism is authoritarian by nature