Interesting question. If the crime necessitates someone being taken into custody, obviously it would be the person who committed the crime. If it's a crime that causes financial harm then obviously the parent would pay, unless their child is working.

13

Generally though, I dislike punishing people by putting them in cages and would rather them pay for most crimes via fines to the victims.

That's a Strasserist idea, btw.

21 definetly

Worth noting, holding parents accountable for non-working children financially would also encourage parents to get their kids working or out of the house, another benefit.

What I don't like is the state choosing to try people as adults arbitrarily. Age to drive 14-17, 18 to smoke,16-18 to have sex, 21 to drink, 17to join the military, 13 to be tried as an adult. Doesn't make sense IMHO.

when one hits puberty

18

or 16

15

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

-Do you take Democratic Socialism as a serious thing, why or why not?

No

no

No

no

because it's socialism

no

No

no.

It's retarded

No fuck you faggot

Fucking reee

*lmao* no

It's socialism

I don’t either. Its mixing democracy with socialism.

It’s retarded

>democracy
kek

socialism doesn't work with democracy

Both are failed systems

I support National Socialism faggot

retarded question

It’s either democracy or socialism

tyranny by the majority

@Pinochet Except that it's often non-democratic

socialism is authoritarian by nature

and majority are retarded lmao

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA Democratic Socialism hahahahha

There's nothing democratic about socialism

^

there is