Message from @devolved
Discord ID: 314779518063607808
particularly the issues discussed in reign of quantity
I don't see hide nor hair of them on counter currents
I liked his writting very much and he wrote heavily on Hermetic and dualist topics
particularly the key insight of inverted morality in the end times
I myself completely dismiss the position of morality that CC embraces, but more for doctrinary reasons than practical
Johnson still insists some things are "immoral" and that others aren't
yeah, probably in an intuitive fashion
rather than justifiably, proceeding from philosophical priors
But I believe that domain of politics has overcome such labels
anyway thanks for your input
At least as far as comprehension goes, of legitimate laws of politis and laws of nature
DUALISM HAS A SINGLE REAL ARGUMENT: THE ACTUAL RULES ARE DIFFERENT BECAUSE OF ANOTHER WORLD
THIS IS DESIGNED TO BAFFLE US INTO IGNORING THE PRESENT WORLD AND ITS LOGICALITY
CREATING A FALSE LOGIC BASED ON HUMAN DESIRES
Does Johnson know that being a faggot is immoral
Dualism is a recognition of the existence of transcendence first
I wonder if the cro mags dudes read guenon
Sign of the times
Dualism is the elevation of falsehood to equivalency with truth
Second, the recognition that the manifested world of perceptions is blurring man's capabilities to perceive and receive transcendent experiences
Dualism implies equality
So it's a lie from the start
And ultimately, recognition that perception of the higher truths, understanding of inner doctrines, and of order "beyon" this world, that is, one that is permanent and resistant to transformations
is a gift of particular individuals
therefore, Aristocrats
And from this capability is deduced the entire system of thought, rule, behavior and conduct that conforms to such higher ideals
Apart from this "perceptive" outlook, dualism isn't radically different from non-dualism
This is typical philosophical "fallacy of the opposites"
Which is why dualists and non-dualists are pefectly able to speak about same doctrines and same concepts perfectly understanding them and agreeing with each other
the perversion of dualist thought immanent to semitic teachings are the problem of these individual philosophies, not the problem of dualism itself
And again, just as a blind man who has regained his sight, did not enter a "different world" but was just made able to perceive
So in dualism, the "beyond" is to be intuitively sought, and not merely speculated upon
Maybe we're not talking about the same thing
The order beyond the world is not opposed to this world
That would be the dualist interpretation
It is greater, more pure
Hierarchically above
This world isn't opposed
It's lesser, inferior
A fallen state