he means you got something wrong in his last.fm

also he tested 145+ i.e. the test wouldnt go any higher

@fallot How come I suddenly became a CC spokeperson

you're the only person I know who reads it with any regularity

I thought you may have an idea

CC apparently follows the footsteps of Guenon in defining it's political philosophy as Traditional

But that's Philosophy, and I think that CC has highly featured dualist perspectives, which I approve of

my ideas and Guenon's ideas match up nearly 1 to 1

there seems to be a large gulf between them

Politically, CC is White Nationalist (NSS)

and what counter-currents represents

Guenon, although he succesfully criticized Western decadence, never fully grasped certain important differentiations, especially in domain of Action where Evola was an authority

While he considered Middle Ages to be the apex of European Civilization from the perspective of Traditional thought and order

He did not conemplate on the relations between domain of action best illustrated in certain European mythology and certain defining events (for example Evola's input on Grail Myth, Spirit of the Oceanic Ages, supremacy of White races, Roman traditions etc)

I am searching counter currents and it appears Johnson himself discussed this

Guenon was also a non-dualist in his comprehension of Tradition

but its a sound file so I guess I will never know exactly how he breaks with Guenon

While Evola argued that dualism is a legitimate *perspective* and that it does not stand in opposition neither to Tradition nor Eastern doctrines, nor to the idea of "Brahman"

James O'Meara is not writing for a long time

particularly the issues discussed in reign of quantity

I don't see hide nor hair of them on counter currents

I liked his writting very much and he wrote heavily on Hermetic and dualist topics

particularly the key insight of inverted morality in the end times

I myself completely dismiss the position of morality that CC embraces, but more for doctrinary reasons than practical

Johnson still insists some things are "immoral" and that others aren't

yeah, probably in an intuitive fashion

rather than justifiably, proceeding from philosophical priors

But I believe that domain of politics has overcome such labels

anyway thanks for your input

At least as far as comprehension goes, of legitimate laws of politis and laws of nature

DUALISM HAS A SINGLE REAL ARGUMENT: THE ACTUAL RULES ARE DIFFERENT BECAUSE OF ANOTHER WORLD

THIS IS DESIGNED TO BAFFLE US INTO IGNORING THE PRESENT WORLD AND ITS LOGICALITY

CREATING A FALSE LOGIC BASED ON HUMAN DESIRES

Does Johnson know that being a faggot is immoral

Dualism is a recognition of the existence of transcendence first

I wonder if the cro mags dudes read guenon

Sign of the times

Dualism is the elevation of falsehood to equivalency with truth

Second, the recognition that the manifested world of perceptions is blurring man's capabilities to perceive and receive transcendent experiences

There is no equality in the universe

Dualism implies equality