but its a sound file so I guess I will never know exactly how he breaks with Guenon

While Evola argued that dualism is a legitimate *perspective* and that it does not stand in opposition neither to Tradition nor Eastern doctrines, nor to the idea of "Brahman"

James O'Meara is not writing for a long time

particularly the issues discussed in reign of quantity

I don't see hide nor hair of them on counter currents

I liked his writting very much and he wrote heavily on Hermetic and dualist topics

particularly the key insight of inverted morality in the end times

I myself completely dismiss the position of morality that CC embraces, but more for doctrinary reasons than practical

Johnson still insists some things are "immoral" and that others aren't

yeah, probably in an intuitive fashion

rather than justifiably, proceeding from philosophical priors

But I believe that domain of politics has overcome such labels

anyway thanks for your input

At least as far as comprehension goes, of legitimate laws of politis and laws of nature

DUALISM HAS A SINGLE REAL ARGUMENT: THE ACTUAL RULES ARE DIFFERENT BECAUSE OF ANOTHER WORLD

THIS IS DESIGNED TO BAFFLE US INTO IGNORING THE PRESENT WORLD AND ITS LOGICALITY

CREATING A FALSE LOGIC BASED ON HUMAN DESIRES

Does Johnson know that being a faggot is immoral

Dualism is a recognition of the existence of transcendence first

I wonder if the cro mags dudes read guenon

Sign of the times

Dualism is the elevation of falsehood to equivalency with truth

Second, the recognition that the manifested world of perceptions is blurring man's capabilities to perceive and receive transcendent experiences

There is no equality in the universe

Dualism implies equality

So it's a lie from the start

And ultimately, recognition that perception of the higher truths, understanding of inner doctrines, and of order "beyon" this world, that is, one that is permanent and resistant to transformations

is a gift of particular individuals

therefore, Aristocrats

And from this capability is deduced the entire system of thought, rule, behavior and conduct that conforms to such higher ideals

Apart from this "perceptive" outlook, dualism isn't radically different from non-dualism

This is typical philosophical "fallacy of the opposites"

Which is why dualists and non-dualists are pefectly able to speak about same doctrines and same concepts perfectly understanding them and agreeing with each other

the perversion of dualist thought immanent to semitic teachings are the problem of these individual philosophies, not the problem of dualism itself

And again, just as a blind man who has regained his sight, did not enter a "different world" but was just made able to perceive

So in dualism, the "beyond" is to be intuitively sought, and not merely speculated upon

Maybe we're not talking about the same thing

The order beyond the world is not opposed to this world

That would be the dualist interpretation

It is greater, more pure

Hierarchically above