CREATING A FALSE LOGIC BASED ON HUMAN DESIRES

Does Johnson know that being a faggot is immoral

Dualism is a recognition of the existence of transcendence first

I wonder if the cro mags dudes read guenon

Sign of the times

Dualism is the elevation of falsehood to equivalency with truth

Second, the recognition that the manifested world of perceptions is blurring man's capabilities to perceive and receive transcendent experiences

There is no equality in the universe

Dualism implies equality

So it's a lie from the start

And ultimately, recognition that perception of the higher truths, understanding of inner doctrines, and of order "beyon" this world, that is, one that is permanent and resistant to transformations

is a gift of particular individuals

therefore, Aristocrats

And from this capability is deduced the entire system of thought, rule, behavior and conduct that conforms to such higher ideals

Apart from this "perceptive" outlook, dualism isn't radically different from non-dualism

This is typical philosophical "fallacy of the opposites"

Which is why dualists and non-dualists are pefectly able to speak about same doctrines and same concepts perfectly understanding them and agreeing with each other

the perversion of dualist thought immanent to semitic teachings are the problem of these individual philosophies, not the problem of dualism itself

And again, just as a blind man who has regained his sight, did not enter a "different world" but was just made able to perceive

So in dualism, the "beyond" is to be intuitively sought, and not merely speculated upon

Maybe we're not talking about the same thing

The order beyond the world is not opposed to this world

That would be the dualist interpretation

It is greater, more pure

Hierarchically above

This world isn't opposed

It's lesser, inferior

A fallen state

But let's use this Christian term, which predates Christianity, in a more flexible fashion

"This world is blind"

have any of you guys ever read "The Masks of God" by Campbell

YES

INTERESTING BOOK

i'm in the middle of it right now. Enjoying it a lot. Not directly alt-right or anything but certainly informative

Diversity is a strength because you’ll be destroyed if you disagree.

People sometimes overestimate the danger of criticizing diversity in apologism of their own lack of courage

operating word "sometimes"

i was just trying to make a logical interpretation of that idiotic mantra. it's strength because to think the opposite is harm.

My perhaps only persistent sentiment when it comes to Political discussion in general, including the most recent alt-right politics, is absolute and staunch intolerance of primitive people and low brow imbeciles

Example #1

https://twitter.com/evolasbae