Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 314758864908320768
there seems to be a large gulf between them
Politically, CC is White Nationalist (NSS)
and what counter-currents represents
Guenon, although he succesfully criticized Western decadence, never fully grasped certain important differentiations, especially in domain of Action where Evola was an authority
While he considered Middle Ages to be the apex of European Civilization from the perspective of Traditional thought and order
He did not conemplate on the relations between domain of action best illustrated in certain European mythology and certain defining events (for example Evola's input on Grail Myth, Spirit of the Oceanic Ages, supremacy of White races, Roman traditions etc)
I am searching counter currents and it appears Johnson himself discussed this
Guenon was also a non-dualist in his comprehension of Tradition
but its a sound file so I guess I will never know exactly how he breaks with Guenon
While Evola argued that dualism is a legitimate *perspective* and that it does not stand in opposition neither to Tradition nor Eastern doctrines, nor to the idea of "Brahman"
James O'Meara is not writing for a long time
particularly the issues discussed in reign of quantity
I don't see hide nor hair of them on counter currents
I liked his writting very much and he wrote heavily on Hermetic and dualist topics
particularly the key insight of inverted morality in the end times
I myself completely dismiss the position of morality that CC embraces, but more for doctrinary reasons than practical
Johnson still insists some things are "immoral" and that others aren't
yeah, probably in an intuitive fashion
rather than justifiably, proceeding from philosophical priors
But I believe that domain of politics has overcome such labels
At least as far as comprehension goes, of legitimate laws of politis and laws of nature
DUALISM HAS A SINGLE REAL ARGUMENT: THE ACTUAL RULES ARE DIFFERENT BECAUSE OF ANOTHER WORLD
THIS IS DESIGNED TO BAFFLE US INTO IGNORING THE PRESENT WORLD AND ITS LOGICALITY
CREATING A FALSE LOGIC BASED ON HUMAN DESIRES
Does Johnson know that being a faggot is immoral
Dualism is a recognition of the existence of transcendence first
I wonder if the cro mags dudes read guenon
Sign of the times
Dualism is the elevation of falsehood to equivalency with truth
Second, the recognition that the manifested world of perceptions is blurring man's capabilities to perceive and receive transcendent experiences
There is no equality in the universe
Dualism implies equality
So it's a lie from the start
And ultimately, recognition that perception of the higher truths, understanding of inner doctrines, and of order "beyon" this world, that is, one that is permanent and resistant to transformations
is a gift of particular individuals
therefore, Aristocrats
And from this capability is deduced the entire system of thought, rule, behavior and conduct that conforms to such higher ideals
Apart from this "perceptive" outlook, dualism isn't radically different from non-dualism
This is typical philosophical "fallacy of the opposites"
Which is why dualists and non-dualists are pefectly able to speak about same doctrines and same concepts perfectly understanding them and agreeing with each other