Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 314757147327987714
oh well
It was long ago
Also not new
I guess there is only despair after all
What's new is, Necrophobic and Sort Vokter
I don't want to know any more
its too personal
anyway, later
And he's only listned to sort vokter once
About a month ago
How does someone with 140 IQ fail at reading a chart?
huh?
also he tested 145+ i.e. the test wouldnt go any higher
@fallot How come I suddenly became a CC spokeperson
you're the only person I know who reads it with any regularity
I thought you may have an idea
CC apparently follows the footsteps of Guenon in defining it's political philosophy as Traditional
But that's Philosophy, and I think that CC has highly featured dualist perspectives, which I approve of
my ideas and Guenon's ideas match up nearly 1 to 1
Politically, CC is White Nationalist (NSS)
and what counter-currents represents
Guenon, although he succesfully criticized Western decadence, never fully grasped certain important differentiations, especially in domain of Action where Evola was an authority
While he considered Middle Ages to be the apex of European Civilization from the perspective of Traditional thought and order
He did not conemplate on the relations between domain of action best illustrated in certain European mythology and certain defining events (for example Evola's input on Grail Myth, Spirit of the Oceanic Ages, supremacy of White races, Roman traditions etc)
I am searching counter currents and it appears Johnson himself discussed this
Guenon was also a non-dualist in his comprehension of Tradition
but its a sound file so I guess I will never know exactly how he breaks with Guenon
While Evola argued that dualism is a legitimate *perspective* and that it does not stand in opposition neither to Tradition nor Eastern doctrines, nor to the idea of "Brahman"
James O'Meara is not writing for a long time
particularly the issues discussed in reign of quantity
I don't see hide nor hair of them on counter currents
I liked his writting very much and he wrote heavily on Hermetic and dualist topics
particularly the key insight of inverted morality in the end times
I myself completely dismiss the position of morality that CC embraces, but more for doctrinary reasons than practical
Johnson still insists some things are "immoral" and that others aren't
yeah, probably in an intuitive fashion
rather than justifiably, proceeding from philosophical priors
But I believe that domain of politics has overcome such labels
anyway thanks for your input