So apparently Trump thinks that there were airports which the American army captured during the revolutionary war

Now I don't know much about American history but I swear that happened in the late 1700s lmao

YLl ugly

Yalll ugly

Hmm

@The Lemon almost as good as the other day when he thought western liberalism meant like, the politics of california

Oh no

TRUMP SUCKS!

Airplanes were totally in the Revolutionary War.

Trump: 🖕

Trump: Oh it was an STD that made me make that sign.

Okay

Someone send a link where trump is seen actually saying that, cuz that sounds like bullshit

Don’t you know the rules of the internet? He’s guilty of saying that until proven innocent. It’s on you to debunk that claim.

Lol shit how could I have forgotten

You must not be a true gamer

Shame

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud7cE6FozPo

https://youtu.be/rWWfPWdbPC8

GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 4!

ykno its kinda amazing how quiet things have gotten for a few days regarding the mueller report

it's been at least 48 hours since trump has even falsely stated "no obstruction no collusion"

he's not wrong either way

it is on the accuser to have the burden of proof to prove he was colluding or obstructing

It is innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent.

@Techpriest except when there is a special counsels office....

and that special counsels office adheres to DOJ policy that states you cannot indict a sitting president

and beyond that you cannot even accuse him of a crime because he doesn't have the opportunity to defend himself in a court of law

so that whole "innocent until proven guilty" talking point isn't much use imo

hence the whole reason that robert mueller explicitly stated in his report that there was never any chance that he *would* have accused the president of any crimes

but, he also made it extremely damn clear that if he could say without a doubt that no crime had been committed on the obstruction front... he would do so

and he didnt

im no sherlock holmes, but my deduction from that is that it's pretty obvious whats happening here in regards to criminal misconduct

And the burden of proof lies on the accuser

Even if Mueller cant indict the president

It does not mean Congress cant hold an impeachment and trial for him

Which they didnt

All bark and no bite

@SDKtheway really you think guilty until proven innocent is the way justice should work? for shame!

If u live in mexico

Makes sense to have that system