Message from @Platinum Spark
Discord ID: 621484945365532683
*Not Allen
Learn your classics
Ahhhhh
smh
@Platinum Spark You know that Trump insults the squad to make sure more people take notice of it
Basically, his plan is to get people to focus on the squad and then link the entire Democrat party to the Squad, which is good for Trump
Makes it easier to appeal to people who are less on the extremes
Not shocking that when your elections become like a reality tv show, the guy who wins it is a reality tv star
I mean AOC (for example) is going with the Trumpian view that any publicity is good publicity (even if it makes her seem like a pretentious teenager)
Well, it fires up his base
But it fires up the progressive base too
And when your margin in mi is .3%, you can’t afford to fire up people in Ann Arbor and flint
@Platinum Spark I know the article is about approval ratings, what I said was that he was simply gaining more minority support in a general sense. Also I do not see how the article synonymized approval ratings with vote total, I'm pretty sure it does make a distinction between the two. These two things also tend to correlate, however, so it isn't wrong to say that if these numbers hold the very well can land him a second term, especially given the other things in his favor this time.
Unless there is something that I missed in the article
I will say though that it shouldn't have claimed that Trump has a certain victory, because it's still too early to tell for sure.
It really doesn't suggest that he's gaining minority support
it's also not a legitimate news source
It makes no claim on how many points it went up by
it straight up says those polls are considered outliers
It does though, it explains that both black and Hispanic approval ratings now have increased relative to the votes respective to these groups, and although these two things are obviously not synonyms they are still indicators of increased support.
I don't think it's a wild claim to suggest that if a person is receiving support then given things go smoothly this will be more or less reflected in the polls. But again, I do disagree with the declarative language in the article.
Also what exactly constitutes a "legitimate" news source?
it actually doesn't say they increased
it implies it
unbiased and, when you're talking about polls, statistically sound
you can tell from the beginning something's off with this article:
"despite shrill denunciations of the president by the Democrats for his alleged racism"
that's not something that a real news organization would write
that's what a conservative blog would write
and they totally have their place, don't get me wrong
but what they're doing here is trying to cherry-pick polls
look at this part:
"this, of course, which is why they have worked so diligently to discredit polls that confirm the president’s gains among minority voters."
GG @Platinum Spark, you just advanced to level 13!
Then not many things can be considered legitimate news, including CNN, Fox, and MSNBC
sure
I disagree with you, but sure let's throw out all three of those
when it comes to polling, 538 is probably the gold standard
but AP, WaPo, WSJ, NYT