Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 677757260281413649


2020-02-14 05:59:07 UTC  

many people might not want walmart or target but it'll be there anyways because in reality poor people are factored out of that equation

2020-02-14 05:59:19 UTC  

Also, if the company is committing violence, i think its not only just, but proper that the community take violent action against them

2020-02-14 05:59:25 UTC  

violence is ok because they don't have a right to the land if they're not contributing to the common welfare

2020-02-14 05:59:41 UTC  

It's not about if the company is committing violence

2020-02-14 05:59:50 UTC  

it could be that, but it's more than that

2020-02-14 06:00:00 UTC  

ok so what gives you the right to property is whether or not you contribute to the common good?

2020-02-14 06:00:11 UTC  

If someone is crippled are they not allowed to own property?

2020-02-14 06:01:03 UTC  

What gives them the right to own it in the first place?

2020-02-14 06:01:11 UTC  

Thats what I just asked you

2020-02-14 06:02:03 UTC  

what gives you the right to *control a part of industry* is if you properly obtain and operate it

2020-02-14 06:02:45 UTC  

property rights are based but owning industry is different because it affects other people in a way having private property wouldn't

2020-02-14 06:03:27 UTC  

Now that you have the jacket, no one else can have the jacket

2020-02-14 06:03:30 UTC  

works the same way

2020-02-14 06:03:38 UTC  

youve deprived the community of a jacket

2020-02-14 06:03:56 UTC  

sounds like you just dont believe in the validity of property rights

2020-02-14 06:04:29 UTC  

what?

2020-02-14 06:04:34 UTC  

I'm talking about industry not property rights

2020-02-14 06:05:01 UTC  

"affects other people in a way having private property wouldn't"

2020-02-14 06:05:09 UTC  

yes

2020-02-14 06:05:17 UTC  

having private property adversely affects the community in a similar way

2020-02-14 06:05:22 UTC  

owning industry affects other people in a way having private property wouldn't

2020-02-14 06:05:26 UTC  

no it doesn't

2020-02-14 06:05:32 UTC  

not at all

2020-02-14 06:05:48 UTC  

possessing something deprives it of the community

2020-02-14 06:05:52 UTC  

industry supplies things to people and is the way people get the things they need

2020-02-14 06:06:06 UTC  

private property is mostly a product of industry

2020-02-14 06:06:36 UTC  

possessing anything necessarily deprives the community of its ownership

2020-02-14 06:06:50 UTC  

not if there's enough of that resource lol

2020-02-14 06:07:17 UTC  

but industry is different because it supplies people with that stuff in the first place

2020-02-14 06:08:12 UTC  

so it necessarily affects more people than one's individual property

2020-02-14 06:08:12 UTC  

GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 7!

2020-02-14 06:08:39 UTC  

affects MORE people, but that doesnt change the principle of it

2020-02-14 06:08:54 UTC  

If you own a jacket, you're depriving the community of a jacket

2020-02-14 06:09:06 UTC  

Thus, you're depriving the community of its ability to keep itself warm

2020-02-14 06:09:20 UTC  

it does effect the princple of it because you can produce your own private property and it can literally affect no one

2020-02-14 06:09:36 UTC  

Sure, thats on a smaller scale than the MEANS OF PRODUCTION but I think the principle is at least similar if not the same

2020-02-14 06:09:38 UTC  

industry necessarily affects everyone

2020-02-14 06:09:46 UTC  

in the community

2020-02-14 06:09:56 UTC  

private property does nothing of the sort

2020-02-14 06:10:15 UTC  

if someone uses private property against the interests of the people than they should have it confiscated or more should happen to them

2020-02-14 06:10:57 UTC  

but you have a right to private property in a different way than you have a right to industry because the industry necessarily affects others