Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 677757260281413649
many people might not want walmart or target but it'll be there anyways because in reality poor people are factored out of that equation
Also, if the company is committing violence, i think its not only just, but proper that the community take violent action against them
violence is ok because they don't have a right to the land if they're not contributing to the common welfare
It's not about if the company is committing violence
it could be that, but it's more than that
ok so what gives you the right to property is whether or not you contribute to the common good?
If someone is crippled are they not allowed to own property?
What gives them the right to own it in the first place?
Thats what I just asked you
what gives you the right to *control a part of industry* is if you properly obtain and operate it
property rights are based but owning industry is different because it affects other people in a way having private property wouldn't
Now that you have the jacket, no one else can have the jacket
works the same way
youve deprived the community of a jacket
sounds like you just dont believe in the validity of property rights
what?
I'm talking about industry not property rights
"affects other people in a way having private property wouldn't"
yes
having private property adversely affects the community in a similar way
no it doesn't
not at all
possessing something deprives it of the community
industry supplies things to people and is the way people get the things they need
private property is mostly a product of industry
possessing anything necessarily deprives the community of its ownership
not if there's enough of that resource lol
but industry is different because it supplies people with that stuff in the first place
so it necessarily affects more people than one's individual property
GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 7!
affects MORE people, but that doesnt change the principle of it
If you own a jacket, you're depriving the community of a jacket
Thus, you're depriving the community of its ability to keep itself warm
it does effect the princple of it because you can produce your own private property and it can literally affect no one
Sure, thats on a smaller scale than the MEANS OF PRODUCTION but I think the principle is at least similar if not the same
industry necessarily affects everyone
in the community
private property does nothing of the sort
if someone uses private property against the interests of the people than they should have it confiscated or more should happen to them
but you have a right to private property in a different way than you have a right to industry because the industry necessarily affects others