Message from @beyond_gravity
Discord ID: 603600464159703050
life expectancy aside, this is what concerns me most with the american system
"A new study from academic researchers found that 66.5 percent of all bankruptcies were tied to medical issues —either because of high costs for care or time out of work. An estimated 530,000 families turn to bankruptcy each year because of medical issues and bills, the research found."
of course when anything is nationalized it loses efficiency and i wouldnt say the canadian system should be the gold standard or anything but theres surely a happy medium id be content with
some sort of optimization
the american style system will always be most efficient, but it has less of a net impact on the overall health of the population and has detrimental consequences for joe average's pocket
Now could there be a medical Reformation, yes, but universal healthcare is not the way to go, but I do wish we’d find an optimization
Because that statistic terrifies me more then Islamic immigration
But I feel if we can turn the tide to a new way, that makes that statistic a minority and not a majority, I will be happy
A low maybe 30 to 20 percent minority would be my goal
In my personal opinion, the probpem with the British NHS is the way it's run
It is not a matter of not enough money
It is a matter of bad management
Deals with companies which lead to the NHS paying 10 times more than a private company for things like allergy pills and shit
@Deleted User yeah that sounds more reasonable
thats how i feel about the canadian system too (im canadian) but thats the problem youre probably always going to have with nationalized industry
like i said it loses efficiency
NHS is incredibly badly run and probably will never get in proper shape unless it’s semi privatised
@beyond_gravity TFL style?
As long as there's good Air Con, it's 100% better
The fucking buses and tubes are boiling
What do you all think about the growing role of geoeconomics and how the US mostly refuses to use or even consider it?
not an argument
it does not grow fast enough
nor does it present an evident danger
Why not? China and Russia for example extend their financial arms more often than their military ones.
China's navy is... lackluster to say the least but the US still considers it a major threat does it not?
No?
They consider China a threat because of its threat to trade partners
South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Philipiness, Taiwan.
China has been fairly self-sufficient
As well
China doesnt preach globalism
It has no need
It preach sinoism instead
What about the one belt one road?
doesnt preach globalism? what the fuck do you think the belt and road initiative is?