Message from @Grenade123
Discord ID: 506981607752728586
You should speak with Rye.
He's so absolutely in favor of federalism you have to suspect he might be a separatist at times.
But he's got lots of arguments and history in his head about the 10th.
As far as opioids, I see much of the problem that we don't want providers to actually spend time with patients anymore. If we have to see 6 patients an hour then the way to do it is give people in pain opioids and people with colds antibiotics. We get what we pay for - an opioid epidemic and superbugs.
Very true, cat.
You are a cool cat
Patients come in demanding those meds and will literally scream at us about bad care when we don't. Since with many insurances we're paid based on quality measures which include satisfaction, there's a perverse incentive to just prescribe whatever as long as it's relatively cheap. Give everyone opioids and antibiotics and you get paid more and the insurance company is happy with you and your patients say good things.
Actually dig into what patients *really* need and they hate you, the insurance fires you, and you can't pay off your $200,000 in student loans
Yeah. Used to be a doctor told patients what they need.
Now patients think they can tell doctors what they want.
Well, that's what the pharma companies tell them during every single &*(#% commercial break.
Sigh
Entitlement is one of the more negative aspects of a democratic system.
"I get to choose the government, you think you can defy me?"
That’s awful! I could never imagine yelling and demanding drugs or anything else from a doctor. I’m so sorry you have to deal with that
So, bookworm, do you think if people did t have a choice they wouldn’t be demanding? I’m not asking this in a condescending tone.
Democratic entitlement would be resolved if we made citizens have to work to earn the right to vote.
Sounds like you read Jerry Pournelle and his Codominion stories. Not sure if people would ever vote to lose the franchise.
the war on drugs has done nothings but put political prisoners in jail, and decimate whole communities for having the gall to get addicted to something that is addictive.
they call it a health crisis and treat it like a crime wave
^^
People want to put shit in their body, fine. But if you are selling something without making known dangers known to the buy, you are lying of omission and i would be fine being considered an illegal act. everything else, let the states decide
alcohol: okay
Nicotine: okay
Pot: not okay
logic found: none
Close guess, I got the idea from Heinlein. But yeah, the only way that could come into being is if there was a civil war and the entire government was reformed.
politics found: lots
also @Dvir service guarantees citizenship?
I loved those books and even the movie.
I tried medicinal pot for a medical issue and it didn’t work for me. In fact, it made me feel awful. But, if it helps some people feel better why would you be against it? (Respectfully)
IM DOING MY PART
Sargons breakdown of the book was brilliant, you watched that?
I did, it inspired me to start rereading the books.
Hmmm... I am now imagining an actual racist supporting strong drug laws and abortion in order to decimate the black community.
I wouldn't be as hardline in the stance of voting, with only federal votes being granted to service-citizens while civilians can still vote in local and state elections.
But the idea of having to do a term of service to the Nation in order to become a politician is a brilliant idea.
@Joe_Limon , Eugenics much?
Right?
If service citizens tend to work for public sector work. Wouldn't only giving them the vote mean they would tend to vote for whatever party increases the government size/spending?
that would assume they had such power
also, it would mean that anyone who sees what is happening would then sign up, earn their vote, then vote down such powers
@Joe_Limon think of it more like mandatory service, only you have the option to opt out at the cost of not being able to vote