Message from @Kibec
Discord ID: 529734694938345487
If they lie they should have the right to, and then be sued for defamation if they don't retract blatantly false statements. And the court of public opinion should also work against them.
IDK if that's viable though...
I wasn't talking about Satire. I was talking about them beeing serious.
and lying about violence and claiming that it was right wing radicals burning shit.
When in reality it was left wing radicals.
so no, your idea is bullshit because you miss 2/3 of the Problem. Because the Legacy Media is the main problem right now, less the shit of the Internet. Most people realize that it ain't true.
but the old pensioner still believe the lies on TV and in the Papers.
Which idea is bullshit, Stefan?
```at the same time, we need to teach people not to believe anything they hear.
or read, in the case of the internet.````
The last part of that.
Its not limited to the Internet, that's bullshit.
Agree
People should always scrutinize data before they make it information.
That's science.
oh that thing leftists have rejected for years now?
yeah, they've replaced it with a true upgrade: feelings and hearsay
Don't forget Taboo and religious dogma.
leftists use religious dogma? I suppose... that'd be the only religious stuff they'd use XD
@GoldenPhoenix they have their own religion
religion of political correctnes
you know how fanatics of religions cant make good jokes or cant take a jokes it is basicaly church of political corectness call the modern “Left”
I can see that. I have a personal aversion to citing religious dogma and such for reasoning, because that's not all that religion is. Religion is important and healthy to society (conceptually, not always in practice), but it should be used together with rigorous logic and science, rather than in place of it during decision making.
you even have religion of science (thats where mad scientists are created)
takem to extremes
is bad
Yes. Moderation is the key. We can discuss all day how much government or economic policy or religion or science we should use, and there's a lot of nuance, but we can at least mostly agree that the all-or-nothing mentality is bad
should "free speech" extend to private forums (private as in created by individuals for express purposes)? discuss
Not by law, but the people who are building those platforms should 100% be applying it to their forums. If you don't keep the principles in habit in your private life you aren't going to be voting for people who do.
Is nudism the ultimate expression of freedom of speech?
That depends
Are you a hot lady? If not then no.
Lmao
Hey, I make no apologies for what I want. A Hot lady naked is useful to me..a fat bald guy naked? Not so much.
Why does it matter about what you see. Wouldn’t it matter more how comfortable you are? Or, is the idea of the government prosecuting people for not wearing what the government wants them too preferable?
i don't think being naked in public is a federal law, idk about most states. but if it was a local law, thats where you get into a bit a conundrum. Can a community enforce its own standards for those those who wish to join it?
You're basically asking if a community can govern.
The answer is, of course.
Naturally, but should they hold this opinion? Is it well informed? Obviously I am not arguing that people shouldn’t be allowed to hold such ideas, I am merely asking if such ideas are based on an accurate rendition of reality
If the opinion that...people should be clothed, is well informed?
I have no idea, because I don't know what their reasoning is. The opinion is accurate, and can be well informed.
This is especially important as companies first censor because nudity=porn in the public consciousness (even though it clearly doesn’t) before they censor political opinion. They do so under the justification that it is just part of what the people want (safety from offense).
Should your local government have the right to enforce a dress code?
Under current legal code, I think that right would be left to the state.