!agree

the other big issue is the massive numbers of personal attacks.
You will not change anyones mind by attacking them.
But that is largely how people treat politics now.

I had a friend that decided to never speak to me again for pointng out when they were spouting propaganda and giving them links to sources like snopes to show them what the truth was, but they just said I was a dirty trump supporter and a bad person who hates brown people.

From the article
'Out of sight'
Gambling Commission executive director Tim Miller called for a "joined-up approach" to keep children safe.
"There's no doubt that today's figures on children and gambling should make people sit up and listen," he said.
"But while discussions about children gambling might conjure up images of kids sneaking into bookies or sitting alone on their iPad gambling on an online casino, our latest research paints a more complex picture.
"The most common activities that children gamble on are not licensed casinos, bingo providers or bookies.
"Instead we found children preferred to gamble in informal environments, out of sight of regulation - private bets between friends or playing cards with their mates for money."

My school was K-12 because I lived out in the boonies.

Yeah but you should not assume that until you know the facts.
You should assume both parties are innocent until proven guilty.

That isn't true at all

Men and women are equaly capable of rape of both sexes.

I would not even say easier.

No need for personal attacks.

That is why you should use sex now

Instead of gender.

Definate maybe

Yeah

Yeah I don't really care at the end of the day, they were a shitty friend in retrospect.

The kind that would borrow from you, but never help you.

The point still stands someone else ineligible tried to run still

Hell people have tried to run pigs in the past.
You can run really, you just can't win lol, so if you manage to get most the electoral votes somehow Congress would have to pick someone

As no one eligible got the required electoral votes to win

I don't think we will see a strong candidate from the dems

They will wait for after trump I think

Running a good candidate against an incumbent is risky and usually wasteful

Not even saving their funds they need to get their house in order to have any hope of winning

They have no good platforms and it is hurting and the clashing between new and old Democrats are hurting them as well

Which is not a real platform

They will not win until their house is in order

It's something both parties need really

They need to redefine themselves

Good and evil are subjective and not a reasonable metric

15/hr min is dumb, it needs to adjust with cost of living and inflation

Not everywhere is the same a single rate will not work

I want to live in a small home.
But I can't even afford a studio because col is fucked compared to minimum wage

And I live in the jurisdiction of the socialist state of Seattle.

We have the highest minimum wage in the nation and a socialist in the city leadership

Lol

I liked bernies idea of max wage for ceos based off the average income of their employees

Cause the rampant wealth hording is bad imo

Yet the income they pay their workers has not kept up with inflation

But the value of that money has gone down

That is a prime example of why intervention is needed

There will always be more people then jobs unless you curb child birth

No it is stabilized in the upper classes

The lower classes still have plenty of children

2.4

Which is still a growing population

Even Smith recognized that the employer has a disproportionate amount of power over the employee.

So just putting it down to supply and demand is just incorrect. The employee needs the employer more then the other way around giving them the ability to deprecate the abilities of the worker

That is not only in a monopoly.
I forget the exact quote but in summation it is.
The employee and the employer need eachother but the employer can go for months without the employee well the employee can go a month without the employer making the workers need much more dire

They have always had the most power even without the specific scenarios.
That was from the wealth of nations.
You know the closest thing capitalism has to a founding document.

Or we need to go into post scarcity economics

Which is the next logical step

We are making robots capable of art we are obsoleting humans

It's always been reduced. Compared to the employers

You realize population growth is related to population density not job availability

People in rural areas have more children generally for this reason

The obvious answer is tax them then

You tax the car, the owner pays if

It even

I go out of my way to avoid automatic sales stations in meat space

I worked retail and know what our is like

Which is why we should be afraid of thinking machines that can self improve

Again that is post scarcity

Once humans are no longer needed for labor you have post scarcity

They can

Popular vote is stupid to bring up anyways.
Popular vote is irrelevant by design

They should join the military

Much better way to get those degrees

Or go into medical, and take classes well you are in with your cos permission then cross train into it

You realize there are military doctors and nurses right?

I had to do a lot of saluting every time I went to the hospital on base, attempting to get into it

You are telling me the majors that were working as doctors didn't exist? Lol

I had some health problems so I got pretty well acquainted with the military hospital

I think you under state the number of military hospitals

Usaf my friend

That's insane if true

The base I was on had both a fully staffed clinic and a fully staffed hospital plenty of enlisted nurses and officer doctors

I don't remember if we had a special name for their job classification in the airforce

I have trouble finding women that are not crazy.

I learned my lesson last time when I had wage gap male privilege and patriarchy shoved down my throat and became a bad person for disputing them lol

Or the problem I run into the most is the rampant daddy issue girls in my demographic whom crave abusive partners

Not how I handle it, I treat my partners as equals because a dismive yes dear is rude imo

To me it is dismissive, you say it to get someone to fuck off

That is what I mean when I talk like that at least

I would not treat my partner like that

I find it disrespectful

I usually say I thought jokes were supposed to be funny

It gets the point across well also letting the person know the conversation is over

Lol

Good joke sperm doner

Does that sound more accurate?

Lol

Pigasus should have won the election.
It would have been a milestone to his species

For those not in the know
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigasus_(politics)

I am also near Seattle

Sakura con is crazy expensive or I would consider going.
Personally I prefer ECC.

Yes

Buy them in advance

The price scalping is crazy if you wait

No man go as Cory