guess god didn't have a plan for her

the point of self driving cars is for them to have sensors that pick up things that a human driver would miss and act accordingly which makes traffic safer. or you could be uber and have no clue what you are doing.

i don't quite understand why people are so against Uber testing out self driving cars. Is it just because they are a shitty company? because while i believe that, i don't see how uber is any different than say a start up. You'd have to look at the money and structure of that part of the company to say they are not really equipped from making that

Tim I think you're naive to think that there isn't anyone at Youtube that thinks they're doing the right thing regarding removing the guns videos or being dumb in general

i dont trust them to be responsible with anything

Well, fair enough. But I mean, I don't trust Google any more with self driving cars.

I don't think we're ready for self driving cars

they aren't ready and humans will get complacent expecing them to be 100%

which is why the person in the uber car didn't react.. wasn't paying attention

google is more concerned with their image than uber.

@LotheronPrime did you watch the video? I don't think I would have reacted quickly enough to grab the wheel.

@Grenade123 yeah look earlier, I said I'm not sure how uber can be at fault here

I'd say Ubers only failure is not being better than a human there. And while there is probably some improvements that could be made, I think any self driving car that doesn't preform worse than a human in any given instance should get the go ahead.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/extinction-countdown/rip-sudan-the-last-male-northern-white-rhino/

Press F to pay respects.

A WHITE MALE?

FUCKING A WHITE MALE!

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/yorkshire-mp-philip-davies-backs-ricky-gervais-in-freedom-of-speech-row-after-youtuber-count-dankula-a3796961.html?utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#link_time=1521747116

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/how-congress-censored-internet/

And with that, the first amendment means jack shit in America

645 page PDF of all S.African Farm Murders from 1994-2012
http://historyreviewed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/List-Farm-Murders-of-Whites-South-Africa.pdf

You aussie right? When will the govt there start taking them in?

And how is the public reaction to this so far?

I heard Ausland takes in alot of refugees.

Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School student David Hogg has no issue with infringing on the 2nd Amendment rights of an entire nation but when the 1st Amendment rights of one high school are infringed he has a problem. https://hotair.com/archives/2018/03/23/gun-control-activist-david-hogg-draws-line-clear-backpacks/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TJObNzyc8M

prolly cuz he's naive enough to believe only the government should need guns to protect and secure the 1st

thats why you don't listen to children

Hogg has said several times hes pro 2a

that seems counter intuitive

His 'pro2a' would have me with muskets

he doesn't want to 'take the guns'

just most of them.

"i'd don't want to take all your guns, just the ones that can fire 100 rounds a minute"

which would actually be all but muskets

Certainly there are folks that draw different lines on things, one person thinks it's OK to yell 'fire' in a crowded building, another makes an exception for such things

but generally the cultural folks who claim they're 'pro2a' folks while spouting anti-AR15 stuff are generally not actually pro2a in any real context since they want to place extreme limitations based on form, not function, of weapons.

They're the people who think DC vs heller was a film.

probably think its a comic book crossover

People still fervently clinging onto the 60's redefinition of the second amendment thanks to the boomer generation

"X is not a militia"

"I support a militia! but that kid totally does not need an AR-15 to kill hajis in the desert"